It is not all benefits from Airbnb and room-sharing platforms: the problem and concerns of collaborative consumption and sharing economies

T. Yuo, Yuanxi Yang
{"title":"It is not all benefits from Airbnb and room-sharing platforms: the problem and concerns of collaborative consumption and sharing economies","authors":"T. Yuo, Yuanxi Yang","doi":"10.15396/eres2019_113","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Sharing economy is so popular nowadays, it is regarded as a new way to generate evolutionary or even revolutionary business models. Owing to the rapid development of verifying, measuring and storing technologies, such as ICT, IoT, GPS, clouds, 5G and block chains, sharing economies have shown its potential in almost all fields: bikes, cars, rooms, logistics, energies, even finance and investments. Explicitly, these technologies seemed to be the solutions of resource indivisibility and free-rider effects, therefore sharing become applicable. Nevertheless, this research believes that sharing is not merely the problem of identifying and delineated the rights and obligations between sharing users. In other words, not all resources are suitable for sharing, especially the stakeholders of the subjects were multiple parties. This research focuses on the concerns of Airbnb-liked room-sharing platforms, collecting opinions from users, providers and the managerial authorities. The results show that sharing is indeed not all about benefits, but comes with all sorts of concerns, ranging from planning issues, devaluing the property value, privacy concerns, to personal safety worries. Another matter is the slow legislation process cannot cope with the rapidly evolving operational patterns in sharing economies. The managerial authorities even could not identify the essence of the problem in sharing to determine the legality of the business. This research suggests that regulating these sharing goods should go back to the fundamental characteristics and not all traditional or old fashion system should be contempt.","PeriodicalId":152375,"journal":{"name":"26th Annual European Real Estate Society Conference","volume":"60 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"26th Annual European Real Estate Society Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15396/eres2019_113","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Sharing economy is so popular nowadays, it is regarded as a new way to generate evolutionary or even revolutionary business models. Owing to the rapid development of verifying, measuring and storing technologies, such as ICT, IoT, GPS, clouds, 5G and block chains, sharing economies have shown its potential in almost all fields: bikes, cars, rooms, logistics, energies, even finance and investments. Explicitly, these technologies seemed to be the solutions of resource indivisibility and free-rider effects, therefore sharing become applicable. Nevertheless, this research believes that sharing is not merely the problem of identifying and delineated the rights and obligations between sharing users. In other words, not all resources are suitable for sharing, especially the stakeholders of the subjects were multiple parties. This research focuses on the concerns of Airbnb-liked room-sharing platforms, collecting opinions from users, providers and the managerial authorities. The results show that sharing is indeed not all about benefits, but comes with all sorts of concerns, ranging from planning issues, devaluing the property value, privacy concerns, to personal safety worries. Another matter is the slow legislation process cannot cope with the rapidly evolving operational patterns in sharing economies. The managerial authorities even could not identify the essence of the problem in sharing to determine the legality of the business. This research suggests that regulating these sharing goods should go back to the fundamental characteristics and not all traditional or old fashion system should be contempt.
并非所有的好处都来自Airbnb和房间共享平台:协作消费和共享经济的问题和担忧
如今,共享经济非常流行,它被视为一种产生进化甚至革命性商业模式的新方式。由于信息通信技术、物联网、GPS、云、5G、区块链等验证、测量和存储技术的快速发展,共享经济在自行车、汽车、房间、物流、能源、甚至金融和投资等几乎所有领域都显示出了潜力。显然,这些技术似乎是解决资源不可分割性和搭便车效应的办法,因此共享变得适用。然而,本研究认为,共享不仅仅是识别和界定共享用户之间的权利和义务的问题。换句话说,并不是所有的资源都适合共享,特别是主体的利益相关者是多方的。这项研究主要关注类似airbnb的房间共享平台的担忧,收集用户、供应商和管理当局的意见。结果表明,共享确实不完全是为了利益,而是伴随着各种各样的担忧,从规划问题、财产价值贬值、隐私问题到个人安全问题。另一个问题是,缓慢的立法进程无法应对共享经济中快速变化的运营模式。管理当局甚至无法确定共享问题的本质,以确定业务的合法性。这一研究表明,对这些共享商品的监管应该回归到根本特征,而不是所有的传统或旧时尚制度都应该被蔑视。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信