A Study On Qt Dispersion And Thrombolytic Therapy In Acute Myocardial Infarction

S. PrabhuShankar., N. Ramya
{"title":"A Study On Qt Dispersion And Thrombolytic Therapy In Acute Myocardial Infarction","authors":"S. PrabhuShankar., N. Ramya","doi":"10.5580/792","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION : \nMyocardial infarction is a common presentation of ischemic heart \ndisease. Ischemic heart disease is the leading cause of death in developed \ncountries, but third to AIDS and lower respiratory infections in developing \ncountries. \nIn India, cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of \ndeath. The deaths due to CVD in India were 32% of all deaths in 2007 and are expected to rise from 1.17 million in 1990 and 1.59 million in 2000 to 2.03 million in 2010. Although a relatively new epidemic in India, it has quickly become a major health issue with deaths due to CVD expected to double during 1985-2015. \n[ Mortality estimates due to CVD vary widely by state, ranging from 10% in \nMeghalaya to 49% in Punjab (percentage of all deaths). Punjab (49%), Goa (42%), Tamil Nadu (36%) and Andhra Pradesh (31%) have the highest CVD related mortality estimates. State-wise differences are correlated with prevalence of specific dietary risk factors in the states. Moderate physical exercise is associated with reduced incidence of CVD in India (those who exercise have less than half the risk of those who don't). CVD also affects Indians at a younger age (in their 30s and 40s) than is typical in other countries. \nQTc dispersion is an important marker that reflect variations of \nventricular repolarisation and arrythmogenic potential. This study is based on various studies suggesting significant reduction in QTc dispersion after \nthrombolytic therapy in acute myocardial infarction. \nAIMS OF THE STUDY : \n1.To calculate the QT, QTc, QTd, QTcd in all patients with acute myocardial infarction. \n2. To determine the difference of QT parameters in patients treated with \nthrombolytic agents(streptokinase) against those not treated with thrombolytic agents(streptokinase). \nMATERIALS AND METHODS : \n102 patients admitted in KAPV Government Medical College Hospital, \nTiruchirapalli for Acute Myocardial infarction were taken up for the study. All \npatients were followed for a period of 8±2 days during their stay in the hospital. \nThe study group was chosen taking into consideration of the following criteria: \nINCLUSION CRITERIA : \n1. Acute Myocardial infarction \n• Chest pain >30 minutes, \n• Chest pain not relieved by rest or nitrates, \n• ST elevation >1mm or 0.1mv in ≥2 limb leads \nST elevation >2mm or 0.2mv in ≥ 2 precordial leads, \n• NSTEMI. \n2. Treatment with Thrombolytic therapy (streptokinase) / without Thrombolytic therapy \nEXCLUSION CRITERIA : \n1. The contraindications for thrombolytic therapy for those patients who were treated with thrombolytic therapy. \n2. Drugs affecting QT interval eg. Quinidine, procainamide, tricyclics & tetracyclics depressants, astemizole, digitalis. \n3. Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, Acute carditis. \n4. Atrial fibrillation, Bundle branch blocks. \n5. Prior coronary bypass surgery. \n6. Serum potassium 5.0mmol/l. \n7. Congenital long QT Syndromes. \nMETHODS : In Patients admitted for Acute Myocardial infarction, a standard 12 lead ECG was taken at paper speed of 25 mm/s at admission and before discharge(day 8±2).From these ECG’s taken in all 102 patients the following parameter were calculated. \nRESULTS AND OBSERVATION : \n1. Composition of the Study Population : \nA total of 102 patients were taken up for the study. Of these 56 patients were treated with thrombolytic therapy and 46 patients were not treated with thrombolytic therapy. There were 92 males (90%) and 10 females(10%),Anterior wall infarction constituted 49%,extensive anterior 10% and inferior wall 41%.There were only 6 patients with NSTEMI. \n2. Age and QT parameters : \nThe QT parameters were correlated among different age groups. The QT \nparameters showed significant variation between the patients treated with \nthrombolytic therapy and not treated with thrombolytic therapy, in age groups 40-49,50-59,60-69.The other age groups did not show significant statistical variation, as the number of patients was small. \n3.QT parameters and Thrombolysis and Site of Infarction. \nThe QT parameters were correlated among study groups and it was \nfound that there was significantly greater reductions in QT parameters at day 8±2 in patients treated with thrombolytic therapy when compared with not treated with thrombolytic therapy. It was noted that anterior wall infarction show significantly greater QT, QTc dispersions when compared with inferior wall infarction. These differences in the QT parameters were all statistically significant. \nCONCLUSION : \n1. There were significantly greater mean QT, QTc dispersions in the early hours of Acute Myocardial infarction. \n2. Patients with anterior acute myocardial infarction showed significantly greater QT parameters when compared with inferior acute myocardial infarction patients. \n3. There were significantly greater reduction in QT, QTc dispersions after \ntreatment with streptokinase than without it. \n4. QT, QTc dispersions are greatest in the early hours of acute myocardial \ninfarction and fall with time and successful thrombolysis \n5.These results can be taken into account in the risk stratification for malignant ventricular tachyarrhythmia’s and they are another evidence for the benefit of thrombolytic therapy in patients with acute myocardial infarction.","PeriodicalId":330833,"journal":{"name":"The Internet Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery","volume":"76 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Internet Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5580/792","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

INTRODUCTION : Myocardial infarction is a common presentation of ischemic heart disease. Ischemic heart disease is the leading cause of death in developed countries, but third to AIDS and lower respiratory infections in developing countries. In India, cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of death. The deaths due to CVD in India were 32% of all deaths in 2007 and are expected to rise from 1.17 million in 1990 and 1.59 million in 2000 to 2.03 million in 2010. Although a relatively new epidemic in India, it has quickly become a major health issue with deaths due to CVD expected to double during 1985-2015. [ Mortality estimates due to CVD vary widely by state, ranging from 10% in Meghalaya to 49% in Punjab (percentage of all deaths). Punjab (49%), Goa (42%), Tamil Nadu (36%) and Andhra Pradesh (31%) have the highest CVD related mortality estimates. State-wise differences are correlated with prevalence of specific dietary risk factors in the states. Moderate physical exercise is associated with reduced incidence of CVD in India (those who exercise have less than half the risk of those who don't). CVD also affects Indians at a younger age (in their 30s and 40s) than is typical in other countries. QTc dispersion is an important marker that reflect variations of ventricular repolarisation and arrythmogenic potential. This study is based on various studies suggesting significant reduction in QTc dispersion after thrombolytic therapy in acute myocardial infarction. AIMS OF THE STUDY : 1.To calculate the QT, QTc, QTd, QTcd in all patients with acute myocardial infarction. 2. To determine the difference of QT parameters in patients treated with thrombolytic agents(streptokinase) against those not treated with thrombolytic agents(streptokinase). MATERIALS AND METHODS : 102 patients admitted in KAPV Government Medical College Hospital, Tiruchirapalli for Acute Myocardial infarction were taken up for the study. All patients were followed for a period of 8±2 days during their stay in the hospital. The study group was chosen taking into consideration of the following criteria: INCLUSION CRITERIA : 1. Acute Myocardial infarction • Chest pain >30 minutes, • Chest pain not relieved by rest or nitrates, • ST elevation >1mm or 0.1mv in ≥2 limb leads ST elevation >2mm or 0.2mv in ≥ 2 precordial leads, • NSTEMI. 2. Treatment with Thrombolytic therapy (streptokinase) / without Thrombolytic therapy EXCLUSION CRITERIA : 1. The contraindications for thrombolytic therapy for those patients who were treated with thrombolytic therapy. 2. Drugs affecting QT interval eg. Quinidine, procainamide, tricyclics & tetracyclics depressants, astemizole, digitalis. 3. Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, Acute carditis. 4. Atrial fibrillation, Bundle branch blocks. 5. Prior coronary bypass surgery. 6. Serum potassium 5.0mmol/l. 7. Congenital long QT Syndromes. METHODS : In Patients admitted for Acute Myocardial infarction, a standard 12 lead ECG was taken at paper speed of 25 mm/s at admission and before discharge(day 8±2).From these ECG’s taken in all 102 patients the following parameter were calculated. RESULTS AND OBSERVATION : 1. Composition of the Study Population : A total of 102 patients were taken up for the study. Of these 56 patients were treated with thrombolytic therapy and 46 patients were not treated with thrombolytic therapy. There were 92 males (90%) and 10 females(10%),Anterior wall infarction constituted 49%,extensive anterior 10% and inferior wall 41%.There were only 6 patients with NSTEMI. 2. Age and QT parameters : The QT parameters were correlated among different age groups. The QT parameters showed significant variation between the patients treated with thrombolytic therapy and not treated with thrombolytic therapy, in age groups 40-49,50-59,60-69.The other age groups did not show significant statistical variation, as the number of patients was small. 3.QT parameters and Thrombolysis and Site of Infarction. The QT parameters were correlated among study groups and it was found that there was significantly greater reductions in QT parameters at day 8±2 in patients treated with thrombolytic therapy when compared with not treated with thrombolytic therapy. It was noted that anterior wall infarction show significantly greater QT, QTc dispersions when compared with inferior wall infarction. These differences in the QT parameters were all statistically significant. CONCLUSION : 1. There were significantly greater mean QT, QTc dispersions in the early hours of Acute Myocardial infarction. 2. Patients with anterior acute myocardial infarction showed significantly greater QT parameters when compared with inferior acute myocardial infarction patients. 3. There were significantly greater reduction in QT, QTc dispersions after treatment with streptokinase than without it. 4. QT, QTc dispersions are greatest in the early hours of acute myocardial infarction and fall with time and successful thrombolysis 5.These results can be taken into account in the risk stratification for malignant ventricular tachyarrhythmia’s and they are another evidence for the benefit of thrombolytic therapy in patients with acute myocardial infarction.
急性心肌梗死Qt离散度与溶栓治疗的研究
心肌梗死是缺血性心脏病的常见表现。缺血性心脏病是发达国家的主要死亡原因,但在发展中国家仅次于艾滋病和下呼吸道感染。在印度,心血管疾病是导致死亡的主要原因。2007年,印度心血管疾病死亡人数占所有死亡人数的32%,预计将从1990年的117万人和2000年的159万人增加到2010年的203万人。尽管这在印度是一种相对较新的流行病,但它已迅速成为一个主要的健康问题,预计在1985-2015年期间,心血管疾病造成的死亡人数将翻一番。[心血管疾病造成的死亡率估计因邦而异,从梅加拉亚邦的10%到旁遮普邦的49%(占所有死亡人数的百分比)不等。旁遮普(49%)、果阿(42%)、泰米尔纳德邦(36%)和安得拉邦(31%)与心血管疾病相关的死亡率估计最高。各州之间的差异与各州特定饮食风险因素的流行程度有关。在印度,适度的体育锻炼与降低心血管疾病的发病率有关(锻炼的人患心血管疾病的风险不到不锻炼的人的一半)。与其他国家相比,印度人患心血管疾病的年龄更小(30多岁和40多岁)。QTc离散度是反映心室复极和心律失常电位变化的重要指标。本研究基于多项研究,表明急性心肌梗死溶栓治疗后QTc离散度显著降低。研究目的:计算所有急性心肌梗死患者的QT、QTc、QTd、QTcd。2. 目的:确定接受溶栓药物(链激酶)治疗的患者与未接受溶栓药物(链激酶)治疗的患者QT间期参数的差异。材料与方法:选取蒂鲁奇拉帕利KAPV政府医学院附属医院收治的102例急性心肌梗死患者为研究对象。所有患者在住院期间随访8±2天。研究组的选择考虑了以下标准:纳入标准:1。•胸痛bbb30分钟,•休息或硝酸盐不能缓解胸痛,•≥2条肢体导联ST段抬高>mm或0.1mv,≥2条心前导联ST段抬高>mm或0.2mv,•NSTEMI。2. 接受溶栓治疗(链激酶)/未接受溶栓治疗。已接受溶栓治疗的患者的溶栓禁忌症。2. 影响QT间期的药物。奎尼丁,普鲁卡因胺,三环和四环抑制剂,阿司咪唑,洋地黄。3.肥厚性心肌病,急性心炎。4. 房颤,束支阻滞。5. 既往冠状动脉搭桥手术。6. 血清钾5.0mmol/l。7. 先天性长QT综合征。方法:急性心肌梗死患者入院时和出院前(第8±2天)分别以25mm /s的纸速取标准12导联心电图。根据所有102例患者的心电图,计算以下参数。结果与观察:研究人群组成:研究共纳入102例患者。其中56例患者接受溶栓治疗,46例患者未接受溶栓治疗。男性92例(90%),女性10例(10%),前壁梗死占49%,广泛前壁梗死占10%,下壁梗死占41%。NSTEMI患者仅有6例。2. 年龄与QT参数:QT参数在不同年龄组间存在相关性。在40-49岁、50-59岁、60-69岁年龄组中,接受溶栓治疗和未接受溶栓治疗的患者QT间期参数有显著差异。其他年龄组由于患者数量较少,没有明显的统计学差异。3.QT参数与溶栓及梗死部位的关系。QT参数在研究组之间是相关的,我们发现接受溶栓治疗的患者与未接受溶栓治疗的患者相比,在第8±2天QT参数的降低明显更大。值得注意的是,与下壁梗死相比,前壁梗死的QT、QTc离散度明显增大。这些QT参数的差异均有统计学意义。结论:1;急性心肌梗死早期QT、QTc离散度明显增高。2. 前路急性心肌梗死患者QT间期参数明显高于下路急性心肌梗死患者。3.链激酶治疗后QT、QTc离散度明显降低。4. QT、QTc弥散度在急性心肌梗死早期最大,随时间和溶栓成功而下降5。 这些结果可以考虑到恶性室性心动过速的风险分层,它们是急性心肌梗死患者溶栓治疗获益的另一个证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信