Managing industrial ecosystems in a united digital space

J. Kovalchuk, I. Stepnov
{"title":"Managing industrial ecosystems in a united digital space","authors":"J. Kovalchuk, I. Stepnov","doi":"10.33051/2500-2325-2022-3-107-121","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Subject/topic. The article presents an original assessment of the development of interaction management systems in modern ecosystems in the context of industrial development and the formation of a united digital space. Goal. The research aims to substantiate approaches to the development of conceptual solutions for the effective management of industrial ecosystems. Methodology. A critical analysis of the spread of the ecosystem approach for integration in industry in the presence of general management patterns is carried out. Results. The factors of formation of a new management model in a united digital space are determined: historical heritage, decentralization/centralization, duality of the management model, feedback, services, cyclicity, technologies, management virtualization, digital trust and digital responsibility, architecture of management structures. The dual nature of new processes is substantiated, when a single system forms two spheres of management (the development management system itself and the interaction management system), interconnected by feedback. It is shown that for an effective production ecosystem, the level of formation of value chains remains the prerogative of participants, which fundamentally distinguishes the ecosystem approach from the cluster approach. The potential of the ecosystem model as an infrastructure or service model, as opposed to a cluster product model, has been established. The technological aspect of management is highlighted, which is based on the property of modern technologies to separate the control and transformational parts, presenting the possibilities of technology management in a digital environment, which creates more effective integration into a united digital space and the inclusion of augmented reality technologies in interaction with cyber-physical systems that ensure the information reliability of managed objects. Conclusions. The differences of the management system in the classical, cluster and ecosystem models are established and a conceptual vision of the possibilities of updating it is formed, taking into account the identified ideas about the structure of interaction in the ecosystem and management efficiency criteria (metrics).","PeriodicalId":193006,"journal":{"name":"Market economy problems","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Market economy problems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33051/2500-2325-2022-3-107-121","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Subject/topic. The article presents an original assessment of the development of interaction management systems in modern ecosystems in the context of industrial development and the formation of a united digital space. Goal. The research aims to substantiate approaches to the development of conceptual solutions for the effective management of industrial ecosystems. Methodology. A critical analysis of the spread of the ecosystem approach for integration in industry in the presence of general management patterns is carried out. Results. The factors of formation of a new management model in a united digital space are determined: historical heritage, decentralization/centralization, duality of the management model, feedback, services, cyclicity, technologies, management virtualization, digital trust and digital responsibility, architecture of management structures. The dual nature of new processes is substantiated, when a single system forms two spheres of management (the development management system itself and the interaction management system), interconnected by feedback. It is shown that for an effective production ecosystem, the level of formation of value chains remains the prerogative of participants, which fundamentally distinguishes the ecosystem approach from the cluster approach. The potential of the ecosystem model as an infrastructure or service model, as opposed to a cluster product model, has been established. The technological aspect of management is highlighted, which is based on the property of modern technologies to separate the control and transformational parts, presenting the possibilities of technology management in a digital environment, which creates more effective integration into a united digital space and the inclusion of augmented reality technologies in interaction with cyber-physical systems that ensure the information reliability of managed objects. Conclusions. The differences of the management system in the classical, cluster and ecosystem models are established and a conceptual vision of the possibilities of updating it is formed, taking into account the identified ideas about the structure of interaction in the ecosystem and management efficiency criteria (metrics).
管理统一数字空间中的工业生态系统
学科/主题。本文在工业发展和统一数字空间形成的背景下,对现代生态系统中交互管理系统的发展进行了初步评估。的目标。该研究旨在为工业生态系统的有效管理提供概念性解决方案。方法。在一般管理模式存在的情况下,对生态系统方法在工业整合中的传播进行了批判性分析。结果。确定了在统一的数字空间中形成新的管理模式的因素:历史遗产、分散/集中、管理模式的二元性、反馈、服务、循环、技术、管理虚拟化、数字信任和数字责任、管理结构的架构。当一个单一的系统形成两个管理领域(开发管理系统本身和交互管理系统),通过反馈相互联系时,新过程的双重性质得到证实。研究表明,对于一个有效的生产生态系统,价值链的形成水平仍然是参与者的特权,这是生态系统方法与集群方法的根本区别。与集群产品模型相反,生态系统模型作为基础设施或服务模型的潜力已经确立。强调了管理的技术方面,这是基于现代技术分离控制和转换部分的特性,呈现了数字环境中技术管理的可能性,这创造了更有效地集成到统一的数字空间中,并在与网络物理系统的交互中包含增强现实技术,以确保管理对象的信息可靠性。结论。建立了管理系统在经典模型、集群模型和生态系统模型中的差异,并考虑到生态系统中相互作用结构和管理效率标准(指标)的确定思想,形成了更新管理系统的可能性的概念性愿景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信