{"title":"Policy Life Cycle Analysis of Three Australian State-level Public Policies: Exploring the Political Dimension of Sustainable Development","authors":"K. Goswami, R. Gerritsen","doi":"10.1177/2455133321998805","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article analyses the life cycle of three Australian public policies (Tasmania Together [TT], South Australia’s Strategic Plan [SASP,] and Western Australia’s State Sustainability Strategy [WA’s SSS]). These policies were formulated at the state level and were structured around sustainable development concepts (the environmental, economic, and social dimensions). This study highlights contexts that led to the making of these public policies, as well as factors that led to their discontinuation. The case studies are based on analysis of parliamentary debates, state governments’ budget reports, public agencies’ annual reports, government media releases, and stakeholders’ feedback. The empirical findings highlight the importance of understanding the political dimension of sustainable development. This fact highlights the need to look beyond the traditional three-dimensional view of sustainability when assessing the success (or lack thereof) of sustainable development policies. Equally important, the analysis indicates that despite these policies’ limited success (and even one of these policies not being implemented at all), sustainability policies can have a legacy beyond their life cycle. Hence, the evaluation of these policies is likely to provide insight into the process of policymaking.","PeriodicalId":243965,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Development Policy and Practice","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Development Policy and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/2455133321998805","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
This article analyses the life cycle of three Australian public policies (Tasmania Together [TT], South Australia’s Strategic Plan [SASP,] and Western Australia’s State Sustainability Strategy [WA’s SSS]). These policies were formulated at the state level and were structured around sustainable development concepts (the environmental, economic, and social dimensions). This study highlights contexts that led to the making of these public policies, as well as factors that led to their discontinuation. The case studies are based on analysis of parliamentary debates, state governments’ budget reports, public agencies’ annual reports, government media releases, and stakeholders’ feedback. The empirical findings highlight the importance of understanding the political dimension of sustainable development. This fact highlights the need to look beyond the traditional three-dimensional view of sustainability when assessing the success (or lack thereof) of sustainable development policies. Equally important, the analysis indicates that despite these policies’ limited success (and even one of these policies not being implemented at all), sustainability policies can have a legacy beyond their life cycle. Hence, the evaluation of these policies is likely to provide insight into the process of policymaking.
本文分析了澳大利亚三项公共政策的生命周期(Tasmania Together [TT], South Australia 's Strategic Plan [SASP,]和Western Australia 's State Sustainability Strategy [WA 's SSS])。这些政策是在州一级制定的,并围绕可持续发展概念(环境、经济和社会层面)构建。这项研究强调了导致这些公共政策制定的背景,以及导致这些政策终止的因素。案例研究基于对议会辩论、州政府预算报告、公共机构年度报告、政府媒体发布和利益相关者反馈的分析。实证研究结果强调了理解可持续发展的政治层面的重要性。这一事实突出表明,在评价可持续发展政策的成功(或失败)时,需要超越传统的可持续性三维观点。同样重要的是,分析表明,尽管这些政策的成功有限(甚至其中一项政策根本没有实施),但可持续性政策可以在其生命周期之外留下遗产。因此,对这些政策的评估很可能提供对政策制定过程的洞察。