Is it Possible to Re-Privatize the U.S. Financial System?

R. C. Whalen
{"title":"Is it Possible to Re-Privatize the U.S. Financial System?","authors":"R. C. Whalen","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1525008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Since the 1930s, when the U.S. Congress interposed government regulation of banks for market discipline, the role of the state in the American financial system has steadily grown. While politicians and executives from the financial services industry characterize the relationship as a 'partnership,' the degree of control exercised by state and federal government over banks and other financial intermediaries has grown enormously over the years – even as the influence exercised over Washington by the largest banks has increased to the same degree. The growth of government involvement in finance, coupled with the growing federal debt and the rising political sway of the large, 'too big to fail' banks that act as dealers in U.S. government debt, raise troubling questions about the future of American democracy. This paper briefly reviews the growth in the role of the government in regulating and supporting the operations of banks and other financial intermediaries since the Great Depression and before. The paper concludes by asking whether this socialization of the risks taken by financial institutions and risk in general, and the growing political power of some of the largest financial services corporations in the world, can be reversed or even should be if consolidation and ever larger banks are the norm.","PeriodicalId":309706,"journal":{"name":"CGN: Governance Law & Arrangements by Subject Matter (Topic)","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CGN: Governance Law & Arrangements by Subject Matter (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1525008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Since the 1930s, when the U.S. Congress interposed government regulation of banks for market discipline, the role of the state in the American financial system has steadily grown. While politicians and executives from the financial services industry characterize the relationship as a 'partnership,' the degree of control exercised by state and federal government over banks and other financial intermediaries has grown enormously over the years – even as the influence exercised over Washington by the largest banks has increased to the same degree. The growth of government involvement in finance, coupled with the growing federal debt and the rising political sway of the large, 'too big to fail' banks that act as dealers in U.S. government debt, raise troubling questions about the future of American democracy. This paper briefly reviews the growth in the role of the government in regulating and supporting the operations of banks and other financial intermediaries since the Great Depression and before. The paper concludes by asking whether this socialization of the risks taken by financial institutions and risk in general, and the growing political power of some of the largest financial services corporations in the world, can be reversed or even should be if consolidation and ever larger banks are the norm.
美国金融体系有可能重新私有化吗?
自20世纪30年代美国国会介入政府对银行的监管以维护市场纪律以来,国家在美国金融体系中的作用稳步增强。虽然金融服务行业的政客和高管们将这种关系描述为“伙伴关系”,但多年来,州政府和联邦政府对银行和其他金融中介机构的控制程度已经大大增加,而大型银行对华盛顿的影响力也在同样程度上增加了。政府越来越多地介入金融,再加上不断增长的联邦债务,以及充当美国政府债务交易商的“大到不能倒”的大型银行的政治影响力不断增强,这让人们对美国民主的未来产生了令人不安的疑问。本文简要回顾了自大萧条以来和之前,政府在监管和支持银行和其他金融中介机构业务方面的作用的增长。本文的结论是,如果合并和银行规模不断扩大成为常态,那么金融机构和一般风险所承担的风险的这种社会化,以及世界上一些最大的金融服务公司日益增长的政治权力,是否可以逆转,甚至应该逆转。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信