Astérix and the Knowledge Management 2.0: An exploration of KMS 2.0 appropriation by the myth of Gallic Village

Aurelie Dudezert, P. Fayard, E. Oiry
{"title":"Astérix and the Knowledge Management 2.0: An exploration of KMS 2.0 appropriation by the myth of Gallic Village","authors":"Aurelie Dudezert, P. Fayard, E. Oiry","doi":"10.9876/SIM.V20I1.618","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"KM processes in companies have profoundly changed in recent years. They became 2.0 KM processes that aim to transform the firm and are driven by a new approach of knowledge in line within 2.0 organisations. These 2.0 knowledge management systems involved oraganisational modes that disrupt with those that previously guided firms’ performance. This can sometimes lead to paradoxical organizational dysfunctions as witnessed by the difficulties faced by some traditionally hierarchical French companies. Through a case study of Constructor and a theoretical background on Information Systems appropriation in organizations and myths in management, we show how the Asterix myth contributes to understand how 2.0. KMS are appropriated in such companies. We find evidence of similarities regarding knowledge and Knowledge Management between the Asterix’ myth and the behaviours and practices concerning knowledge management within Constructor . As a result, the Asterix’ myth may be a relevant perspective for understanding the obstacles, advantages and appropriations of 2.0. KMS within French organizations. This paper contributes to research papers dealing with the impact of symbolism in IS appropriation.","PeriodicalId":220138,"journal":{"name":"French Journal of Management Information Systems","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"French Journal of Management Information Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9876/SIM.V20I1.618","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

KM processes in companies have profoundly changed in recent years. They became 2.0 KM processes that aim to transform the firm and are driven by a new approach of knowledge in line within 2.0 organisations. These 2.0 knowledge management systems involved oraganisational modes that disrupt with those that previously guided firms’ performance. This can sometimes lead to paradoxical organizational dysfunctions as witnessed by the difficulties faced by some traditionally hierarchical French companies. Through a case study of Constructor and a theoretical background on Information Systems appropriation in organizations and myths in management, we show how the Asterix myth contributes to understand how 2.0. KMS are appropriated in such companies. We find evidence of similarities regarding knowledge and Knowledge Management between the Asterix’ myth and the behaviours and practices concerning knowledge management within Constructor . As a result, the Asterix’ myth may be a relevant perspective for understanding the obstacles, advantages and appropriations of 2.0. KMS within French organizations. This paper contributes to research papers dealing with the impact of symbolism in IS appropriation.
astimrix与知识管理2.0:高卢村神话对知识管理2.0的占用探讨
近年来,企业的知识管理过程发生了深刻的变化。它们成为2.0知识管理过程,旨在改变企业,并由2.0组织内的新知识方法驱动。这些2.0知识管理系统所涉及的组织模式颠覆了以前指导企业绩效的组织模式。这有时会导致矛盾的组织功能失调,一些传统等级制度的法国公司所面临的困难就是明证。通过对Constructor的案例研究以及组织中信息系统占用和管理神话的理论背景,我们展示了Asterix神话如何有助于理解2.0。KMS在这样的公司中被使用。我们发现在Asterix神话和Constructor内部关于知识管理的行为和实践之间,关于知识和知识管理的相似性的证据。因此,Asterix的神话可能是理解2.0的障碍、优势和优势的一个相关视角。法国组织内部的KMS。本文为研究象征主义在IS挪用中的影响的论文做出了贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信