Quantum implementation of the Shor-code on multiple simulator platforms

N. Neumann, Jelle Nauta, F. Phillipson
{"title":"Quantum implementation of the Shor-code on multiple simulator platforms","authors":"N. Neumann, Jelle Nauta, F. Phillipson","doi":"10.1117/12.2532539","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Running general quantum algorithms on quantum computers is hard, especially in the early stage of development of the quantum computer that we are in today. Many resources are required to transform a general problem to be run on a quantum computer, for instance to satisfy the topology constraints of the quantum hardware. Furthermore, quantum computers need to operate at temperatures close to absolute zero, and hence resources are required to keep the quantum hardware at that level. Therefore, simulating small instances of a quantum algorithm is often preferred over running it on actual quantum hardware. This is both cheaper and gives debugging capabilities which are unavailable on actual quantum hardware, such as the evaluation of the full quantum state, at intermediate points in the algorithm as well as at the end of the algorithm. By simulating small instances of quantum algorithms, the quantum algorithm can be checked for errors and be debugged before implementing and running it on actual quantum hardware for larger instances. There are multiple initiatives to create quantum simulators and while looking alike, there are difference among them. In this work we compare seven often used quantum simulators offered by various parties by implementing the Shor-code, an error-correcting technique. The Shor-code can detect and correct all single qubit errors in a quantum circuit. For most multi-qubit errors, correct detection and correction is not possible. We compare the seven quantum simulators on different aspects, such as how easy it is to implement the Shor-code, what its capabilities are regarding translation to actual quantum hardware and what the possibilities of simulating noise are. We also discuss aspects such as topology restrictions and the programming interface.","PeriodicalId":189492,"journal":{"name":"Quantum Technologies and Quantum Information Science V","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quantum Technologies and Quantum Information Science V","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2532539","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Running general quantum algorithms on quantum computers is hard, especially in the early stage of development of the quantum computer that we are in today. Many resources are required to transform a general problem to be run on a quantum computer, for instance to satisfy the topology constraints of the quantum hardware. Furthermore, quantum computers need to operate at temperatures close to absolute zero, and hence resources are required to keep the quantum hardware at that level. Therefore, simulating small instances of a quantum algorithm is often preferred over running it on actual quantum hardware. This is both cheaper and gives debugging capabilities which are unavailable on actual quantum hardware, such as the evaluation of the full quantum state, at intermediate points in the algorithm as well as at the end of the algorithm. By simulating small instances of quantum algorithms, the quantum algorithm can be checked for errors and be debugged before implementing and running it on actual quantum hardware for larger instances. There are multiple initiatives to create quantum simulators and while looking alike, there are difference among them. In this work we compare seven often used quantum simulators offered by various parties by implementing the Shor-code, an error-correcting technique. The Shor-code can detect and correct all single qubit errors in a quantum circuit. For most multi-qubit errors, correct detection and correction is not possible. We compare the seven quantum simulators on different aspects, such as how easy it is to implement the Shor-code, what its capabilities are regarding translation to actual quantum hardware and what the possibilities of simulating noise are. We also discuss aspects such as topology restrictions and the programming interface.
short -code在多个模拟器平台上的量子实现
在量子计算机上运行一般的量子算法是困难的,特别是在我们今天所处的量子计算机发展的早期阶段。将一般问题转换为在量子计算机上运行需要许多资源,例如满足量子硬件的拓扑约束。此外,量子计算机需要在接近绝对零度的温度下运行,因此需要资源来保持量子硬件在这个水平。因此,模拟量子算法的小实例通常比在实际的量子硬件上运行更可取。这既便宜,又提供了在实际量子硬件上不可用的调试功能,例如在算法的中间点和算法结束时对完整量子状态的评估。通过模拟量子算法的小实例,可以检查量子算法的错误,并在为更大的实例在实际量子硬件上实现和运行之前进行调试。有多种创建量子模拟器的计划,虽然看起来很相似,但它们之间也有区别。在这项工作中,我们通过实现短码,一种纠错技术,比较了各方提供的七种常用量子模拟器。短码可以检测和纠正量子电路中的所有单量子比特错误。对于大多数多量子位错误,正确的检测和纠正是不可能的。我们从不同的方面比较了七个量子模拟器,例如实现short -code的容易程度,将其转换为实际量子硬件的能力以及模拟噪声的可能性。我们还讨论了拓扑限制和编程接口等方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信