Some Twins are Not Alike: FDI Premia in the Former Soviet States

V. Gattai, Rajssa Mechelli, Piergiovanna Natale
{"title":"Some Twins are Not Alike: FDI Premia in the Former Soviet States","authors":"V. Gattai, Rajssa Mechelli, Piergiovanna Natale","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2795139","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to estimate foreign direct investment (FDI) premia in the former Soviet states.Design/methodology/approachThe authors follow an empirical approach. Using Orbis data for a sample of more than 3,000 companies, the authors characterize FDI involvement and FDI premia of firms from three distinctive groups of former Soviet states, designated “upper-middle”-income, “lower-middle”-income and “high”-income countries. This yields interesting within-group and between-group results on the effects of outward FDI (OFDI) and inward FDI (IFDI) on firm-level innovation.FindingsThe authors unveil new facts about innovation and FDI in the former Soviet states. FDI firms innovate more than non-FDI firms and OFDI firms innovate more than IFDI firms. The innovation effect of OFDI is the largest for firms from the “lower-middle” countries, followed by the “high” and “upper-middle” countries. The innovation effect of IFDI is the largest for firms from the “lower-middle” countries, followed by the “upper-middle” and “high” countries. FDI to and from Europe has the largest impact on innovation; this holds across country groups.Research limitations/implicationsThe estimates of this paper document robust FDI premia, i.e., a positive and significant correlation between firm-level innovation and FDI. However, the cross-sectional nature of the data does not permit a proper causality analysis.Originality/valueThe paper contributes to the literature on FDI premia by: considering IFDI and OFDI in a unified empirical framework; dissecting IFDI and OFDI by location; measuring firm-level productivity in terms of innovation; and providing cross-country comparable evidence on both emerging and advanced economies. At the same time, the paper contributes to the literature on FDI from emerging economies by: taking a firm-level quantitative approach; focusing on a relatively unexplored set of countries; and providing comparable cross-country evidence on both emerging and advanced economies.","PeriodicalId":415063,"journal":{"name":"University of Milan Bicocca Department of Economics","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"University of Milan Bicocca Department of Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2795139","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to estimate foreign direct investment (FDI) premia in the former Soviet states.Design/methodology/approachThe authors follow an empirical approach. Using Orbis data for a sample of more than 3,000 companies, the authors characterize FDI involvement and FDI premia of firms from three distinctive groups of former Soviet states, designated “upper-middle”-income, “lower-middle”-income and “high”-income countries. This yields interesting within-group and between-group results on the effects of outward FDI (OFDI) and inward FDI (IFDI) on firm-level innovation.FindingsThe authors unveil new facts about innovation and FDI in the former Soviet states. FDI firms innovate more than non-FDI firms and OFDI firms innovate more than IFDI firms. The innovation effect of OFDI is the largest for firms from the “lower-middle” countries, followed by the “high” and “upper-middle” countries. The innovation effect of IFDI is the largest for firms from the “lower-middle” countries, followed by the “upper-middle” and “high” countries. FDI to and from Europe has the largest impact on innovation; this holds across country groups.Research limitations/implicationsThe estimates of this paper document robust FDI premia, i.e., a positive and significant correlation between firm-level innovation and FDI. However, the cross-sectional nature of the data does not permit a proper causality analysis.Originality/valueThe paper contributes to the literature on FDI premia by: considering IFDI and OFDI in a unified empirical framework; dissecting IFDI and OFDI by location; measuring firm-level productivity in terms of innovation; and providing cross-country comparable evidence on both emerging and advanced economies. At the same time, the paper contributes to the literature on FDI from emerging economies by: taking a firm-level quantitative approach; focusing on a relatively unexplored set of countries; and providing comparable cross-country evidence on both emerging and advanced economies.
有些双胞胎不一样:前苏联国家的外国直接投资溢价
本文的目的是估计前苏联国家的外国直接投资(FDI)溢价。设计/方法/方法作者采用实证方法。作者利用奥比斯对3000多家公司样本的数据,描述了来自前苏联国家三个不同群体的公司的外国直接投资参与和外国直接投资溢价的特征,这些国家被称为“中高”收入、“中低收入”和“高”收入国家。这就产生了关于对外直接投资(OFDI)和对内直接投资(IFDI)对企业层面创新的影响的有趣的组内和组间结果。作者揭示了关于前苏联国家创新和外国直接投资的新事实。外国直接投资企业比非外国直接投资企业创新更多,对外直接投资企业比对外直接投资企业创新更多。“中下”国家企业的对外直接投资创新效应最大,其次是“高”国家和“中上”国家。IFDI对“中下”国家企业的创新效应最大,其次是“中上”国家和“高”国家。进出欧洲的外国直接投资对创新的影响最大;这在各个国家群体中都适用。研究局限/启示本文的估计表明了强劲的FDI溢价,即企业层面的创新与FDI之间存在显著的正相关关系。然而,数据的横断面性质不允许进行适当的因果关系分析。本文对FDI溢价研究的贡献在于:将IFDI和OFDI放在一个统一的实证框架中考虑;按地区剖析IFDI和OFDI;从创新角度衡量企业层面的生产率;并提供新兴经济体和发达经济体的跨国可比证据。同时,本文通过以下几个方面对新兴经济体FDI研究文献进行了补充:采用企业层面的定量方法;聚焦于相对未开发的国家;并提供新兴经济体和发达经济体的可比跨国证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信