Earnings Risks, Savings and Wealth Concentration

M. Mohaghegh
{"title":"Earnings Risks, Savings and Wealth Concentration","authors":"M. Mohaghegh","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3590701","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A criticism of earnings risk models of wealth inequality is that they do not accurately capture individual's earnings risks. I construct a stochastic process that directly determines workers earnings. I use a set of new empirical moments to match moments of earnings changes in the universe of workers in the U.S. economy. Despite its computational challenges, a stochastic process that determines earnings instead of labor productivity improves the modeling of risks as it allows me to (1) reproduce the distribution of earnings, (2) match several moments of the distribution of earnings changes, and (3) skill-dependence of earnings profiles. To study the implications of such data-guided earnings risks for wealth concentration, I develop a general equilibrium stochastic life cycle production economy with skilled and unskilled workers. I show that data-guided earnings risks, contrary to what Castaneda et al. (2003) implies, are not large enough to explain high saving rates of top earners. Therefore, wealth in the model is less concentrated than the data. I also study how changes in earnings affect the distribution of wealth over time. Consistent with the data, I allow for earnings profiles, skill premium, share of skilled workers in the population, and tax schedules to vary with time. My findings show that changes in Wealth inequality between 1989 and 2013 can almost entirely be attributed to changes in earnings dispersion. Although in both periods, wealth concentration is lower than the data, changes in the wealth share of top one percent over time matches the data.","PeriodicalId":176300,"journal":{"name":"Microeconomics: Intertemporal Consumer Choice & Savings eJournal","volume":"87 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Microeconomics: Intertemporal Consumer Choice & Savings eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3590701","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A criticism of earnings risk models of wealth inequality is that they do not accurately capture individual's earnings risks. I construct a stochastic process that directly determines workers earnings. I use a set of new empirical moments to match moments of earnings changes in the universe of workers in the U.S. economy. Despite its computational challenges, a stochastic process that determines earnings instead of labor productivity improves the modeling of risks as it allows me to (1) reproduce the distribution of earnings, (2) match several moments of the distribution of earnings changes, and (3) skill-dependence of earnings profiles. To study the implications of such data-guided earnings risks for wealth concentration, I develop a general equilibrium stochastic life cycle production economy with skilled and unskilled workers. I show that data-guided earnings risks, contrary to what Castaneda et al. (2003) implies, are not large enough to explain high saving rates of top earners. Therefore, wealth in the model is less concentrated than the data. I also study how changes in earnings affect the distribution of wealth over time. Consistent with the data, I allow for earnings profiles, skill premium, share of skilled workers in the population, and tax schedules to vary with time. My findings show that changes in Wealth inequality between 1989 and 2013 can almost entirely be attributed to changes in earnings dispersion. Although in both periods, wealth concentration is lower than the data, changes in the wealth share of top one percent over time matches the data.
收益风险、储蓄和财富集中
对财富不平等的收益风险模型的一种批评是,它们没有准确地捕捉到个人的收益风险。我构建了一个直接决定工人收入的随机过程。我使用了一组新的经验时刻来匹配美国经济中工人群体的收入变化时刻。尽管存在计算方面的挑战,但决定收入而非劳动生产率的随机过程改善了风险建模,因为它允许我(1)再现收入分布,(2)匹配收入分布变化的几个时刻,以及(3)收入概况的技能依赖性。为了研究这种数据导向的收益风险对财富集中的影响,我开发了一个一般均衡随机生命周期生产经济,包括熟练工人和非熟练工人。我表明,与Castaneda等人(2003)所暗示的相反,数据导向的收入风险不足以解释高收入者的高储蓄率。因此,模型中的财富集中度低于数据。我也研究收入的变化如何随着时间的推移影响财富的分配。与数据一致,我允许收入概况、技能溢价、熟练工人在人口中的份额和税收时间表随时间而变化。我的研究结果表明,1989年至2013年间财富不平等的变化几乎完全可以归因于收入差距的变化。尽管在这两个时期,财富集中度都低于数据,但前1%的财富份额随时间的变化与数据相符。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信