Choosing by Advantages; Benefits Analysis and Implementation in a Case Study, Colombia

Juan Pablo Ramírez Cortés, J. Ponz-Tienda, Jose Miguel Delgado, Laura Gutierrez-Bucheli
{"title":"Choosing by Advantages; Benefits Analysis and Implementation in a Case Study, Colombia","authors":"Juan Pablo Ramírez Cortés, J. Ponz-Tienda, Jose Miguel Delgado, Laura Gutierrez-Bucheli","doi":"10.24928/2018/0531","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There are many methods of multicriteria decision analysis (MCDA), each one with properties and benefits. In the Architecture, Engineering, and Construction (AEC) sector most of the time, the decision–making involve different interest of the stakeholders of the projects, must of the times applying methods with the focus on the result. This paper presents a case study of a new University’s facility construction that compares the traditional decision–making approach used in the design-bid-build procurement method of AEC industry in Colombia with an MCDA approach. Choosing By Advantages (CBA) has been used to analyse the reasons that could help explain why the subcontractor of a project construction was not meeting the client’s expectations during project execution. Results include a discussion of main differences between these decision methods, the main difference is that in traditional decision–making approach the main criterion was cost while in the CBA was value. Consequently, the method’s results were different for the alternatives.","PeriodicalId":419313,"journal":{"name":"26th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"26th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24928/2018/0531","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

There are many methods of multicriteria decision analysis (MCDA), each one with properties and benefits. In the Architecture, Engineering, and Construction (AEC) sector most of the time, the decision–making involve different interest of the stakeholders of the projects, must of the times applying methods with the focus on the result. This paper presents a case study of a new University’s facility construction that compares the traditional decision–making approach used in the design-bid-build procurement method of AEC industry in Colombia with an MCDA approach. Choosing By Advantages (CBA) has been used to analyse the reasons that could help explain why the subcontractor of a project construction was not meeting the client’s expectations during project execution. Results include a discussion of main differences between these decision methods, the main difference is that in traditional decision–making approach the main criterion was cost while in the CBA was value. Consequently, the method’s results were different for the alternatives.
择优;效益分析与实施案例研究,哥伦比亚
多准则决策分析(MCDA)有很多方法,每一种方法都有自己的特点和优点。在建筑、工程和建设(AEC)领域,大多数时候,决策涉及项目利益相关者的不同利益,必须经常采用以结果为重点的方法。本文介绍了一所新大学设施建设的案例研究,比较了哥伦比亚AEC行业设计招标建造采购方法中使用的传统决策方法与MCDA方法。选择优势(CBA)已被用来分析的原因,可以帮助解释为什么分包商的项目建设没有达到客户的期望在项目执行。结果包括讨论了这些决策方法的主要区别,主要区别在于传统决策方法的主要标准是成本,而CBA决策方法的主要标准是价值。因此,该方法的结果是不同的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信