Loss Comparison of Various Unidirectional Rectifiers for Medium Voltage Applications

Sayani Chatterjee, D. Mukherjee, D. Kastha
{"title":"Loss Comparison of Various Unidirectional Rectifiers for Medium Voltage Applications","authors":"Sayani Chatterjee, D. Mukherjee, D. Kastha","doi":"10.1109/CALCON49167.2020.9106426","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Unidirectional rectifiers are being preferred for applications where power flows only from ac side to dc side such as the machine side converter in a permanent magnet synchronous generator (PMSG) based wind energy conversion systems (WECS), as active front end rectifiers for medium voltage (MV) fans, pumps, blowers, compressors, and power supplies for telecommunications, X-ray, naval equipments etc. Absence of the regenerative or reactive power requirements make these converter topologies simpler with reduced number of active switches which increase power density and reliability, and reduce cost. This paper compares various converter topologies that can be used as unidirectional rectifiers for MV applications (3.5 MVA, 4 kV). The topologies compared in this paper are based on the PLECS simulation results which takes various characteristic plots of the semiconductor devices as given in manufacturer’s datasheets. The comparison results show the superiority of the five-level dual flying capacitor based active neutral point clamped (DFC-ANPC) topology in terms of power density, efficiency and even distribution of losses across the devices.","PeriodicalId":318478,"journal":{"name":"2020 IEEE Calcutta Conference (CALCON)","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 IEEE Calcutta Conference (CALCON)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CALCON49167.2020.9106426","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Unidirectional rectifiers are being preferred for applications where power flows only from ac side to dc side such as the machine side converter in a permanent magnet synchronous generator (PMSG) based wind energy conversion systems (WECS), as active front end rectifiers for medium voltage (MV) fans, pumps, blowers, compressors, and power supplies for telecommunications, X-ray, naval equipments etc. Absence of the regenerative or reactive power requirements make these converter topologies simpler with reduced number of active switches which increase power density and reliability, and reduce cost. This paper compares various converter topologies that can be used as unidirectional rectifiers for MV applications (3.5 MVA, 4 kV). The topologies compared in this paper are based on the PLECS simulation results which takes various characteristic plots of the semiconductor devices as given in manufacturer’s datasheets. The comparison results show the superiority of the five-level dual flying capacitor based active neutral point clamped (DFC-ANPC) topology in terms of power density, efficiency and even distribution of losses across the devices.
中压应用中各种单向整流器的损耗比较
单向整流器被优选用于功率仅从交流侧流向直流侧的应用,例如基于永磁同步发电机(PMSG)的风能转换系统(WECS)中的机器侧变流器,作为中压(MV)风扇、泵、鼓风机、压缩机和电信、x射线、海军设备等电源的有源前端整流器。无再生或无功功率要求使这些转换器拓扑结构更简单,减少了有源开关的数量,从而提高了功率密度和可靠性,并降低了成本。本文比较了可用于中压应用(3.5 MVA, 4 kV)的单向整流器的各种转换器拓扑结构。本文所比较的拓扑结构是基于PLECS仿真结果,该仿真结果采用了制造商数据表中给出的半导体器件的各种特性图。对比结果表明,基于五电平双飞行电容的有源中性点箝位(DFC-ANPC)拓扑在功率密度、效率和器件损耗均匀分布方面具有优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信