{"title":"The Consciousness of Being Alive as a Source of Knowledge","authors":"U. Renz","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780192843616.003.0002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter addresses the question whether our consciousness of being alive can be a source of knowledge, and if so, of what kind of knowledge. It examines this question as it is discussed by a sequence of early modern philosophers who all implicitly consider the issue. The chapter begins with a discussion of the early modern idea of consciousness, viewed as an epistemic relation. It goes on to show that interest in the notion that we are immediately aware of being alive arose in reaction to Descartes’ dualism. For example, the Cartesian Louis de La Forge attempted, but failed, to accommodate the feeling of being alive within a dualist framework. Against this background, the chapter turns to discuss Spinoza’s early attempts to appeal to our consciousness of being alive in order to refute Cartesian scepticism. It concludes that our consciousness of being alive can be considered a source of knowledge, and that, however simple this lesson appears, it may be of moral importance.","PeriodicalId":129974,"journal":{"name":"Life and Death in Early Modern Philosophy","volume":"48 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Life and Death in Early Modern Philosophy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192843616.003.0002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This chapter addresses the question whether our consciousness of being alive can be a source of knowledge, and if so, of what kind of knowledge. It examines this question as it is discussed by a sequence of early modern philosophers who all implicitly consider the issue. The chapter begins with a discussion of the early modern idea of consciousness, viewed as an epistemic relation. It goes on to show that interest in the notion that we are immediately aware of being alive arose in reaction to Descartes’ dualism. For example, the Cartesian Louis de La Forge attempted, but failed, to accommodate the feeling of being alive within a dualist framework. Against this background, the chapter turns to discuss Spinoza’s early attempts to appeal to our consciousness of being alive in order to refute Cartesian scepticism. It concludes that our consciousness of being alive can be considered a source of knowledge, and that, however simple this lesson appears, it may be of moral importance.
这一章讨论的问题是,我们活着的意识是否可以成为知识的来源,如果可以,是什么样的知识。它考察了这个问题,因为它是由一系列早期现代哲学家讨论的,他们都含蓄地考虑这个问题。这一章首先讨论了早期现代的意识概念,将其视为一种认知关系。它继续表明,人们对“我们立即意识到自己活着”这一概念的兴趣是对笛卡尔二元论的回应。例如,笛卡尔学派的路易斯·德·拉·福吉(Louis de La Forge)试图在二元论框架内容纳活着的感觉,但失败了。在此背景下,本章转而讨论斯宾诺莎早期试图诉诸我们的活着意识,以驳斥笛卡尔的怀疑主义。它的结论是,我们活着的意识可以被认为是知识的来源,而且,无论这个教训看起来多么简单,它可能具有道德重要性。