A comparative analysis of approaches to apply the sustainable livelihoods framework to do impact assessment in ICT4D

Joan Mwenda, Marita Turpin
{"title":"A comparative analysis of approaches to apply the sustainable livelihoods framework to do impact assessment in ICT4D","authors":"Joan Mwenda, Marita Turpin","doi":"10.1109/ISTAFRICA.2016.7530682","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The use of ICT to promote sustainable development, whether socioeconomic or human development, has increased over the past few decades. However, there is a need to ensure that ICT4D projects achieve their intended development outcomes. The Sustainable Livelihoods (SL) Framework provides a possible means to measure the impact of development programs/projects, by focusing on less disadvantaged household's vulnerabilities, assets, processes, structures and livelihood outcomes. The development agencies DFID, CARE and UNDP each have a different version of the SL framework with which to assess developmental impact. This paper discusses and compares the three approaches that are available to apply the SL framework. The paper concludes with a reflection on the three approaches, and recommendations for applying the SL framework in ICT4D.","PeriodicalId":326074,"journal":{"name":"2016 IST-Africa Week Conference","volume":"137 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-05-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 IST-Africa Week Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISTAFRICA.2016.7530682","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

The use of ICT to promote sustainable development, whether socioeconomic or human development, has increased over the past few decades. However, there is a need to ensure that ICT4D projects achieve their intended development outcomes. The Sustainable Livelihoods (SL) Framework provides a possible means to measure the impact of development programs/projects, by focusing on less disadvantaged household's vulnerabilities, assets, processes, structures and livelihood outcomes. The development agencies DFID, CARE and UNDP each have a different version of the SL framework with which to assess developmental impact. This paper discusses and compares the three approaches that are available to apply the SL framework. The paper concludes with a reflection on the three approaches, and recommendations for applying the SL framework in ICT4D.
在ICT4D中应用可持续生计框架进行影响评估的方法比较分析
在过去几十年里,利用信息通信技术促进可持续发展,无论是社会经济发展还是人类发展,都有所增加。然而,有必要确保ict - 4d项目实现其预期的发展成果。可持续生计框架通过关注弱势家庭的脆弱性、资产、流程、结构和生计成果,为衡量发展计划/项目的影响提供了一种可能的手段。发展机构英国国际发展部、援外合作署和联合国开发计划署各自都有不同版本的SL框架,用来评估发展影响。本文讨论并比较了可用于应用SL框架的三种方法。本文最后对这三种方法进行了反思,并提出了在ICT4D中应用SL框架的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信