ISA 240 BAĞIMSIZ DENETÇİNİN HİLEYE İLİŞKİN SORUMLULUKLARINDA GÜNCEL GELİŞMELER: IAASB BEKLENTİ FARKLARINI AZALTMA PROJESİ

Özkan Sarisoy, Çağla DEMİR PALİ
{"title":"ISA 240 BAĞIMSIZ DENETÇİNİN HİLEYE İLİŞKİN SORUMLULUKLARINDA GÜNCEL GELİŞMELER: IAASB BEKLENTİ FARKLARINI AZALTMA PROJESİ","authors":"Özkan Sarisoy, Çağla DEMİR PALİ","doi":"10.25095/mufad.1246110","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Auditing standards that guide the auditing profession change and develop in line with the changes in the business world. In addition, various institutions conduct research and studies in this field. In 2020, the IAASB initiated a project to amend ISA 240, The Responsibilities Relating to Fraud in an Audit of Financial Statements. Within this project's scope, the reasons for the expectation gap regarding Fraud and going concerns and the possible solutions are investigated. In this study, the responses to the discussion paper published by the IAASB were examined. According to the results, the most important reasons for the expectation gap are that the public and the members of the financial reporting ecosystem, in general, do not have enough information about the audit, the auditors are not qualified enough, the audit is misevaluated, and parties in the ecosystem have unrealistic expectations. Among the most notable suggestions to narrow the gap are educating the members of the financial reporting ecosystem and the public, updating standards, preparing guides, and using technology/data analytics methods in auditing. In addition, the importance of clarifying key concepts such as materiality, reasonable assurance, auditing, Fraud, and professional skepticism is emphasized to narrow the expectation gap.","PeriodicalId":150564,"journal":{"name":"Muhasebe ve Finansman Dergisi","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Muhasebe ve Finansman Dergisi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25095/mufad.1246110","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Auditing standards that guide the auditing profession change and develop in line with the changes in the business world. In addition, various institutions conduct research and studies in this field. In 2020, the IAASB initiated a project to amend ISA 240, The Responsibilities Relating to Fraud in an Audit of Financial Statements. Within this project's scope, the reasons for the expectation gap regarding Fraud and going concerns and the possible solutions are investigated. In this study, the responses to the discussion paper published by the IAASB were examined. According to the results, the most important reasons for the expectation gap are that the public and the members of the financial reporting ecosystem, in general, do not have enough information about the audit, the auditors are not qualified enough, the audit is misevaluated, and parties in the ecosystem have unrealistic expectations. Among the most notable suggestions to narrow the gap are educating the members of the financial reporting ecosystem and the public, updating standards, preparing guides, and using technology/data analytics methods in auditing. In addition, the importance of clarifying key concepts such as materiality, reasonable assurance, auditing, Fraud, and professional skepticism is emphasized to narrow the expectation gap.
指导审计职业的审计准则随着商业世界的变化而变化和发展。此外,各种机构在这一领域进行研究和研究。2020年,国际会计准则理事会启动了修订国际会计准则第240号《财务报表审计中与舞弊有关的责任》的项目。在这个项目的范围内,调查了关于欺诈和持续经营的期望差距的原因和可能的解决方案。在本研究中,对IAASB发表的讨论文件的回应进行了审查。结果表明,造成预期差距的最重要原因是公众和财务报告生态系统成员对审计的了解不足、审计人员资质不足、审计结果被误判、生态系统各方期望不现实。缩小差距的最值得注意的建议是教育财务报告生态系统的成员和公众,更新标准,编写指南,以及在审计中使用技术/数据分析方法。此外,强调澄清关键概念的重要性,如重要性、合理保证、审计、欺诈和专业怀疑,以缩小预期差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信