Jiaanbieyuan New Courtyard-Garden Housing in Suzhou: Residents’ Experiences of the Redevelopment

Donia Zhang
{"title":"Jiaanbieyuan New Courtyard-Garden Housing in Suzhou: Residents’\n Experiences of the Redevelopment","authors":"Donia Zhang","doi":"10.36922/JCAU.V1I1.526","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Cultural vitality as the fourth pillar of sustainable development has\n been widely acknowledged, and vernacular architecture as a major part of a\n nation’s material culture has entered the cultural sustainability dialogue.\n This recognition demands that new housing design and development should\n honor a local or regional identity. This in-depth case study assesses the\n architectural, environmental, spatial, constructional, social, cultural, and\n behavioral aspects of the Jiaanbieyuan (“Excellent Peace Courtyard-Garden\n Housing Estate”) built in Suzhou, China, in 1998. The 500-unit Jiaanbieyuan\n is located close to two UNESCO World Cultural Heritage sites, the Canglang\n (“Surging Waves”) Pavilion and the Master-of-Nets Garden. It has attempted\n to recreate Suzhou’s traditional architecture and landscape architecture.\n Quantitative and qualitative data were collected through numerous research\n methods, including onsite surveys and interviews. The findings show the new\n housing forms do not promote social relations as effectively as the\n traditional housing of the past. Moreover, the communal Central Garden has\n functioned to some extent as a social and cultural activity space. The study\n further proposes a new courtyard-garden housing system that facilitates\n social interaction and cultural activities.","PeriodicalId":429385,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Chinese Architecture and Urbanism","volume":"56 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Chinese Architecture and Urbanism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36922/JCAU.V1I1.526","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Cultural vitality as the fourth pillar of sustainable development has been widely acknowledged, and vernacular architecture as a major part of a nation’s material culture has entered the cultural sustainability dialogue. This recognition demands that new housing design and development should honor a local or regional identity. This in-depth case study assesses the architectural, environmental, spatial, constructional, social, cultural, and behavioral aspects of the Jiaanbieyuan (“Excellent Peace Courtyard-Garden Housing Estate”) built in Suzhou, China, in 1998. The 500-unit Jiaanbieyuan is located close to two UNESCO World Cultural Heritage sites, the Canglang (“Surging Waves”) Pavilion and the Master-of-Nets Garden. It has attempted to recreate Suzhou’s traditional architecture and landscape architecture. Quantitative and qualitative data were collected through numerous research methods, including onsite surveys and interviews. The findings show the new housing forms do not promote social relations as effectively as the traditional housing of the past. Moreover, the communal Central Garden has functioned to some extent as a social and cultural activity space. The study further proposes a new courtyard-garden housing system that facilitates social interaction and cultural activities.
苏州嘉庵别苑新四合院住宅:居民的再开发体验
文化活力作为可持续发展的第四大支柱已得到广泛认可,乡土建筑作为一个国家物质文化的重要组成部分已进入文化可持续性对话。这种认识要求新的住房设计和开发应该尊重当地或地区的身份。这个深入的案例研究评估了1998年在中国苏州建造的嘉别园(“优秀的和平庭院住宅小区”)的建筑、环境、空间、构造、社会、文化和行为方面。嘉别苑拥有500个单元,毗邻两处联合国教科文组织世界文化遗产——沧浪阁和网师园。它试图重现苏州的传统建筑和景观建筑。通过现场调查和访谈等多种研究方法收集定量和定性数据。研究结果表明,新的住房形式并不像过去的传统住房那样有效地促进社会关系。此外,公共中心花园在一定程度上也起到了社会文化活动空间的作用。该研究进一步提出了一个新的庭院花园住宅系统,促进社会互动和文化活动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信