Relationship between State and Civil Society: Theoretical Review

Abdou Barrow
{"title":"Relationship between State and Civil Society: Theoretical Review","authors":"Abdou Barrow","doi":"10.52483/ijsed.v2i1.22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Relationship between state and civil society has been of great interest in the field of social sciences especially in the field of sociology and political science. There have been several theorist that tries to look into this relationship. The aim of this paper is to review the theoretical approaches of Marxist, Elites, and Neo-Consensualist on the relations between state and civil society in nowadays societies. Research are based on literature studies, on conflict perspectives in sociology. These theories are very prominent when talking about state-civil society relationship in sociology. Marxist looks the relationship between the two as conflictual, meaning dominant civil society use the state as an instrument in exploiting the weak economic class. Elites argue the relationship differently from that of Marxist and liberals, as for them, state is run by few individuals at the expense of the mass. In the eye of Neo-Consensualist is entirely a different story, as that of Parson view certain prospectin the social world of constituting the society that is; norms, and values. As for Bellah he sought religion as a mechanism in the spirit of acculturating a kind of doctrine in a sense that, state and citizens go bye. Result for this theoretical views is elites show the relationship different from the Marxist and liberals, as for them the state is run by few individuals at the expense of the mass. This people are a minority group that has influence through economically, socially and the like but in short they have potentials in making things happen. This minority group the called them the elite as the mas they called the ruled.","PeriodicalId":360116,"journal":{"name":"Indonesian Journal of Sociology, Education, and Development","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indonesian Journal of Sociology, Education, and Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52483/ijsed.v2i1.22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Relationship between state and civil society has been of great interest in the field of social sciences especially in the field of sociology and political science. There have been several theorist that tries to look into this relationship. The aim of this paper is to review the theoretical approaches of Marxist, Elites, and Neo-Consensualist on the relations between state and civil society in nowadays societies. Research are based on literature studies, on conflict perspectives in sociology. These theories are very prominent when talking about state-civil society relationship in sociology. Marxist looks the relationship between the two as conflictual, meaning dominant civil society use the state as an instrument in exploiting the weak economic class. Elites argue the relationship differently from that of Marxist and liberals, as for them, state is run by few individuals at the expense of the mass. In the eye of Neo-Consensualist is entirely a different story, as that of Parson view certain prospectin the social world of constituting the society that is; norms, and values. As for Bellah he sought religion as a mechanism in the spirit of acculturating a kind of doctrine in a sense that, state and citizens go bye. Result for this theoretical views is elites show the relationship different from the Marxist and liberals, as for them the state is run by few individuals at the expense of the mass. This people are a minority group that has influence through economically, socially and the like but in short they have potentials in making things happen. This minority group the called them the elite as the mas they called the ruled.
国家与公民社会的关系:理论回顾
国家与公民社会的关系一直是社会科学领域,特别是社会学和政治学领域非常感兴趣的问题。有几位理论家试图研究这种关系。本文的目的是回顾马克思主义、精英主义和新共识主义关于当今社会国家与市民社会关系的理论方法。研究的基础是文献研究,社会学的冲突视角。这些理论在社会学研究国家-市民社会关系时十分突出。马克思主义认为两者之间的关系是冲突的,即占主导地位的公民社会将国家作为剥削弱势经济阶层的工具。精英们认为这种关系与马克思主义者和自由主义者不同,在他们看来,国家是由少数人以牺牲大众为代价来管理的。在新共识主义者的眼中是完全不同的故事,正如帕森在社会世界中所看到的构成社会的某些前景;规范和价值观。至于贝拉,他把宗教作为一种机制,在某种意义上,以一种适应文化的精神来寻求一种信条,即国家和公民分道扬镳。这种理论观点的结果是精英表现出与马克思主义和自由主义者不同的关系,因为他们认为国家是由少数人以牺牲大众为代价来经营的。这些人是少数群体,他们在经济、社会等方面都有影响力,但简而言之,他们有潜力让事情发生。这个少数群体称他们为精英,因为他们称他们为被统治者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信