Replication and Extension of Schnappinger’s Study on Human-level Ordinal Maintainability Prediction Based on Static Code Metrics

Sébastien Bertrand, Silvia Ciappelloni, Pierre-Alexandre Favier, J. André
{"title":"Replication and Extension of Schnappinger’s Study on Human-level Ordinal Maintainability Prediction Based on Static Code Metrics","authors":"Sébastien Bertrand, Silvia Ciappelloni, Pierre-Alexandre Favier, J. André","doi":"10.1145/3593434.3593488","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As a part of a research project concerning software maintainability assessment in collaboration with the development team, we wanted to explore dissensions between developers and the confounding effect of size. To this end, this study replicated and extended a recent study from Schnappinger et al. with the public part of its dataset and the metrics extracted from the graph-based tool Javanalyser. The entire processing pipeline was automated, from metrics extraction to the training of machine learning models. The study was extended by predicting the continuous maintainability to take account of dissensions. Then, all experimental shots were duplicated to evaluate the overall influence of the class size. In the end, the original study was successfully replicated. Moreover, good performance was achieved on the continuous maintainability prediction. Finally, the class size was not sufficient for fine-grained maintainability prediction. This study shows the necessity to explore the nature of what is measured by code metrics, and is also the first step in the construction of a maintainability model.","PeriodicalId":178596,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3593434.3593488","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As a part of a research project concerning software maintainability assessment in collaboration with the development team, we wanted to explore dissensions between developers and the confounding effect of size. To this end, this study replicated and extended a recent study from Schnappinger et al. with the public part of its dataset and the metrics extracted from the graph-based tool Javanalyser. The entire processing pipeline was automated, from metrics extraction to the training of machine learning models. The study was extended by predicting the continuous maintainability to take account of dissensions. Then, all experimental shots were duplicated to evaluate the overall influence of the class size. In the end, the original study was successfully replicated. Moreover, good performance was achieved on the continuous maintainability prediction. Finally, the class size was not sufficient for fine-grained maintainability prediction. This study shows the necessity to explore the nature of what is measured by code metrics, and is also the first step in the construction of a maintainability model.
Schnappinger基于静态代码度量的人类级别有序可维护性预测研究的复制与推广
作为与开发团队合作的软件可维护性评估研究项目的一部分,我们想要探索开发人员之间的分歧和规模的混淆效应。为此,本研究复制并扩展了Schnappinger等人最近的一项研究,使用其数据集的公共部分和从基于图形的工具Javanalyser中提取的指标。从指标提取到机器学习模型的训练,整个处理流程都是自动化的。通过预测持续可维护性来考虑纠纷,扩展了研究。然后,重复所有实验镜头,以评估班级规模的整体影响。最终,原始研究被成功复制。此外,在持续可维护性预测方面取得了较好的效果。最后,类的大小不足以进行细粒度的可维护性预测。这项研究显示了探索代码度量的本质的必要性,这也是构建可维护性模型的第一步。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信