Efficacy of peritonsillar infiltration of levobupivacaine-dexamethasone versus levobupivacaine-dexmedetomidine in children undergoing tonsillectomy surgery: a prospective, randomized double-blind study

S. Hayes, Hisham Atef Ebada, Hanaa M. El Bendary
{"title":"Efficacy of peritonsillar infiltration of levobupivacaine-dexamethasone versus levobupivacaine-dexmedetomidine in children undergoing tonsillectomy surgery: a prospective, randomized double-blind study","authors":"S. Hayes, Hisham Atef Ebada, Hanaa M. El Bendary","doi":"10.4103/roaic.roaic_36_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose We evaluated the quality of analgesia produced by peritonsillar infiltration of levobupivacaine with either dexamethasone or dexmedetomidine in children undergoing tonsillectomy surgery. Patients and methods Patients scheduled for tonsillectomy were randomly allocated into three groups with 27 patients in each group. Group L received peritonsillar infiltration of 5 ml in volume of 0.4 mg/kg of 0.5% levobupivacaine, while group D received peritonsillar infiltration of 5 ml in volume of 0.4 mg/kg of 0.5% levobupivacaine mixed with dexamethasone 0.5 mg/kg and group X received peritonsillar infiltration of 5 ml in volume of 0.4 mg/kg of 0.5% levobupivacaine mixed with dexmedetomidine 1 μg/kg (with infiltration of 2.5 ml in each tonsil in all groups) with the first postoperative analgesic request as the primary outcome. Results Postoperative time to first analgesic paracetamol request was prolonged in group D (19.51±2.34 h) compared with group L (4.15±0.53 h) and group X (15.74±2.29 h). Face, leg, activity, cry, consolability (FLACC) Behavioral Pain Assessment score at rest and during swallowing decreased in group D compared with group L and group X. Total postoperative analgesic consumption decreased in group D (581.48±165.7 mg) compared with group L (1303.51±90.10 mg) and group X (680.50±160.67 mg). Conclusions We concluded that peritonsillar infiltration of levobupivacaine when mixed with either dexamethasone or dexmedetomidine for patients undergoing tonsillectomy produced prolonged analgesia; however, dexamethasone was superior to dexmedetomidine with more prolonged time to first paracetamol request and prolonged late postoperative pain relief.","PeriodicalId":151256,"journal":{"name":"Research and Opinion in Anesthesia and Intensive Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research and Opinion in Anesthesia and Intensive Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/roaic.roaic_36_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose We evaluated the quality of analgesia produced by peritonsillar infiltration of levobupivacaine with either dexamethasone or dexmedetomidine in children undergoing tonsillectomy surgery. Patients and methods Patients scheduled for tonsillectomy were randomly allocated into three groups with 27 patients in each group. Group L received peritonsillar infiltration of 5 ml in volume of 0.4 mg/kg of 0.5% levobupivacaine, while group D received peritonsillar infiltration of 5 ml in volume of 0.4 mg/kg of 0.5% levobupivacaine mixed with dexamethasone 0.5 mg/kg and group X received peritonsillar infiltration of 5 ml in volume of 0.4 mg/kg of 0.5% levobupivacaine mixed with dexmedetomidine 1 μg/kg (with infiltration of 2.5 ml in each tonsil in all groups) with the first postoperative analgesic request as the primary outcome. Results Postoperative time to first analgesic paracetamol request was prolonged in group D (19.51±2.34 h) compared with group L (4.15±0.53 h) and group X (15.74±2.29 h). Face, leg, activity, cry, consolability (FLACC) Behavioral Pain Assessment score at rest and during swallowing decreased in group D compared with group L and group X. Total postoperative analgesic consumption decreased in group D (581.48±165.7 mg) compared with group L (1303.51±90.10 mg) and group X (680.50±160.67 mg). Conclusions We concluded that peritonsillar infiltration of levobupivacaine when mixed with either dexamethasone or dexmedetomidine for patients undergoing tonsillectomy produced prolonged analgesia; however, dexamethasone was superior to dexmedetomidine with more prolonged time to first paracetamol request and prolonged late postoperative pain relief.
左布比卡因-地塞米松与左布比卡因-右美托咪定在扁桃体切除术儿童扁桃体周围浸润的疗效:一项前瞻性,随机双盲研究
目的评价儿童扁桃体切除术后左旋布比卡因与地塞米松或右美托咪定在扁桃体周围浸润的镇痛效果。拟行扁桃体切除术的患者随机分为3组,每组27例。L组接受体积为0.4 mg/kg 0.5%左布比卡因的囊周浸润5ml;D组采用体积0.4 mg/kg 0.5%左布比卡因混合地塞米松0.5 mg/kg的囊周浸润5 ml, X组采用体积0.4 mg/kg 0.5%左布比卡因混合右美托咪定1 μg/kg的囊周浸润5 ml(各组各扁桃体浸润2.5 ml),以术后第一次镇痛要求为主要终点。结果与L组(4.15±0.53 h)和X组(15.74±2.29 h)相比,D组(19.51±2.34 h)术后首次请求镇痛时间明显延长。面部、腿部、活动、哭泣、安慰(FLACC)行为疼痛评估评分在休息时和吞咽时均低于L组和X组。术后总镇痛消耗D组(581.48±165.7 mg)低于L组(1303.51±90.10 mg)和X组(680.50±160.67 mg)。结论扁桃体切除术患者左旋布比卡因与地塞米松或右美托咪定混合时,扁桃体周围浸润可延长镇痛时间;然而,地塞米松优于右美托咪定,对第一次扑热息痛要求的时间更长,术后后期疼痛缓解时间更长。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信