Should bronchodilator response be assessed in all asthmatic children with normal baseline spirometry?

N. Beydon, E. Dufetelle, P. Bokov, C. Delclaux
{"title":"Should bronchodilator response be assessed in all asthmatic children with normal baseline spirometry?","authors":"N. Beydon, E. Dufetelle, P. Bokov, C. Delclaux","doi":"10.1183/13993003.CONGRESS-2018.OA3587","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Normal lung function is frequent in asthmatic children referred for lung function testing, still a positive bronchodilator response (BDR+) can be evidenced and is therefore often looked for. Objectives: To assess 1) the prevalence of BDR+ among children with normal baseline spirometry; 2) the ability of baseline spirometry indices to detect BDR+. Methods: Monocenter retrospective study between 2009 and 2017 based on the department database including all children referred for asthma. Children with normal (i.e. > -1.64 z-score) baseline forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1), and FEV1/FVC, along with a BDR+ (≥ 12% FEV1 increase) were compared to children with normal baseline spirometry but negative BDR (BDR-) using Z-test. The ability of FEV1 and FEV1/FVC to discriminate a BDR+ was determined after constructing Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves. Results: BDR was recorded in 7,750 files out of 8,586 (90.3%) with available baseline spirometry. Among these, 5,238 displayed a normal baseline spirometry, of which 4.9% (95% confidence interval (CI): 4.3%-5.5%) had a BDR+. ROC analysis displayed similar areas under the curve (AUC) for FEV1 (AUC=0.69, 95% CI: 0.56-0.83) and FEV1/FVC (AUC=0.71, 95% CI: 0.58-0.85). Detecting 90% of BDR+ (90% sensitivity) could be ensured by testing only cases with FEV1 z-score lower than 0.42 (68.1% total files), or with FEV1/FVC z-score lower than -0.16 (67.4% total files). Conclusions: Systematic BDR testing in asthmatic children with normal baseline spirometry reveals that only 4.9% of cases have a BDR+. Detecting 90% of BDR+ could be achieved by testing two-third of the cases.","PeriodicalId":116156,"journal":{"name":"Paediatric respiratory physiology and sleep","volume":"62 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Paediatric respiratory physiology and sleep","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.CONGRESS-2018.OA3587","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Normal lung function is frequent in asthmatic children referred for lung function testing, still a positive bronchodilator response (BDR+) can be evidenced and is therefore often looked for. Objectives: To assess 1) the prevalence of BDR+ among children with normal baseline spirometry; 2) the ability of baseline spirometry indices to detect BDR+. Methods: Monocenter retrospective study between 2009 and 2017 based on the department database including all children referred for asthma. Children with normal (i.e. > -1.64 z-score) baseline forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1), and FEV1/FVC, along with a BDR+ (≥ 12% FEV1 increase) were compared to children with normal baseline spirometry but negative BDR (BDR-) using Z-test. The ability of FEV1 and FEV1/FVC to discriminate a BDR+ was determined after constructing Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves. Results: BDR was recorded in 7,750 files out of 8,586 (90.3%) with available baseline spirometry. Among these, 5,238 displayed a normal baseline spirometry, of which 4.9% (95% confidence interval (CI): 4.3%-5.5%) had a BDR+. ROC analysis displayed similar areas under the curve (AUC) for FEV1 (AUC=0.69, 95% CI: 0.56-0.83) and FEV1/FVC (AUC=0.71, 95% CI: 0.58-0.85). Detecting 90% of BDR+ (90% sensitivity) could be ensured by testing only cases with FEV1 z-score lower than 0.42 (68.1% total files), or with FEV1/FVC z-score lower than -0.16 (67.4% total files). Conclusions: Systematic BDR testing in asthmatic children with normal baseline spirometry reveals that only 4.9% of cases have a BDR+. Detecting 90% of BDR+ could be achieved by testing two-third of the cases.
所有基线肺活量正常的哮喘儿童都应该评估支气管扩张剂反应吗?
背景:在转介肺功能检查的哮喘患儿中,肺功能正常是常见的,但仍可证实支气管扩张剂反应(BDR+)阳性,因此经常被寻找。目的:评估1)基线肺活量正常儿童BDR+的患病率;2)基线肺活量测定指标检测BDR+的能力。方法:基于2009 - 2017年科室数据库的单中心回顾性研究,包括所有转诊哮喘患儿。使用z检验将基线用力肺活量(FVC)、1秒内用力呼气量(FEV1)、FEV1/FVC正常(即> -1.64 z评分)以及BDR+ (FEV1增加≥12%)的儿童与基线肺活量正常但BDR (BDR-)阴性的儿童进行比较。构建受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线,确定FEV1和FEV1/FVC识别BDR+的能力。结果:8586份文件中有7750份记录了BDR(90.3%),有可用的基线肺活量测定。其中5238例肺活量基线正常,其中4.9%(95%可信区间(CI): 4.3% ~ 5.5%)为BDR+。ROC分析显示FEV1的曲线下面积(AUC)相似(AUC=0.69, 95% CI: 0.56-0.83)和FEV1/FVC (AUC=0.71, 95% CI: 0.58-0.85)。仅检测FEV1 z-评分低于0.42(总文件数的68.1%)或FEV1/FVC z-评分低于-0.16(总文件数的67.4%)的病例,可确保检测出90%的BDR+(90%的灵敏度)。结论:对基线肺活量正常的哮喘患儿进行系统的BDR检测显示,只有4.9%的病例BDR+。检测三分之二的病例可实现检测90%的BDR+。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信