Conceptualisation and experience of ownership in multi-stakeholder partnerships: Lessons from the HDECoVA initiative in Ethiopia

E. Asrat, Alebachew Kemisso Haybano, Susanne Gustavsson
{"title":"Conceptualisation and experience of ownership in multi-stakeholder partnerships: Lessons from the HDECoVA initiative in Ethiopia","authors":"E. Asrat, Alebachew Kemisso Haybano, Susanne Gustavsson","doi":"10.3384/njvet.2242-458x.2212320","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Ownership is commonly considered a key principle aiming to promote effective multi-stakeholder partnerships. This article explores the conceptualisation and experience of ownership in a multi-stakeholder initiative in TVET, with an empirical focus on a Public-Private Development Partnership (PPDP) in Ethiopia. The qualitative case study is based on insights derived from semi-structured interviews with project staff and partnership actors and an analysis of relevant documents. The findings indicate discrepancies between rhetoric and reality of ownership dynamics, which complicates the actual ownership practice. The goal of all-inclusive equitable participation, originally intended, is not achieved. Power is not equally shared in the initiative, as local actors play a limited role in the decision-making process, and therefore do not acquire ownership as intended. In this case, the PPDP approach reproduces inequality as international actors exert influence through indirect governance. This study suggests a coherent understanding of the ownership concept, which emphasises the relationship between all parties, promoting co-ownership, rather than merely defining the roles of donors and beneficiaries. PPDPs are likely to achieve better results and local actors may sustain outcomes when their capacity is built through active engagement in the process and the partnership is implemented through joint commitment, responsibility, and equal participation. ","PeriodicalId":410150,"journal":{"name":"Nordic Journal of Vocational Education and Training","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nordic Journal of Vocational Education and Training","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3384/njvet.2242-458x.2212320","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Ownership is commonly considered a key principle aiming to promote effective multi-stakeholder partnerships. This article explores the conceptualisation and experience of ownership in a multi-stakeholder initiative in TVET, with an empirical focus on a Public-Private Development Partnership (PPDP) in Ethiopia. The qualitative case study is based on insights derived from semi-structured interviews with project staff and partnership actors and an analysis of relevant documents. The findings indicate discrepancies between rhetoric and reality of ownership dynamics, which complicates the actual ownership practice. The goal of all-inclusive equitable participation, originally intended, is not achieved. Power is not equally shared in the initiative, as local actors play a limited role in the decision-making process, and therefore do not acquire ownership as intended. In this case, the PPDP approach reproduces inequality as international actors exert influence through indirect governance. This study suggests a coherent understanding of the ownership concept, which emphasises the relationship between all parties, promoting co-ownership, rather than merely defining the roles of donors and beneficiaries. PPDPs are likely to achieve better results and local actors may sustain outcomes when their capacity is built through active engagement in the process and the partnership is implemented through joint commitment, responsibility, and equal participation. 
多方利益相关者伙伴关系中所有权的概念和经验:来自埃塞俄比亚HDECoVA倡议的教训
所有权通常被认为是旨在促进有效的多利益攸关方伙伴关系的关键原则。本文探讨了职业技术教育多利益相关者倡议中所有权的概念和经验,并以埃塞俄比亚的公私发展伙伴关系(PPDP)为实证重点。定性案例研究基于对项目工作人员和伙伴关系参与者的半结构化访谈以及对相关文件的分析得出的见解。研究结果表明,所有权动态的修辞与现实之间存在差异,这使实际的所有权实践变得复杂。最初设想的包容一切的公平参与的目标没有实现。由于地方行动者在决策过程中发挥的作用有限,因此并没有像预期的那样获得所有权,因此在倡议中权力并没有平等地分享。在这种情况下,PPDP方法再现了不平等,因为国际行动者通过间接治理施加影响。这项研究建议对所有权概念有一个连贯的理解,它强调所有各方之间的关系,促进共同所有权,而不仅仅是确定捐助者和受益者的作用。如果通过积极参与这一进程来建立能力,并通过共同承诺、责任和平等参与来实施伙伴关系,公私伙伴关系就有可能取得更好的结果,地方行动者也有可能维持成果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信