{"title":"Memorializing monuments: State space and state rollback under neo-liberalization in Mexico","authors":"A. Morton","doi":"10.1386/aps_00059_1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recent contributions to urban geography have considered state space by innovatively focusing on specific cases of the city built environment. Examples could include here Karl Schlögel’s slicing through the spaces of state power in Moscow 1937 or Yuri Slezkine’s methodological cue to read the saga of the Russian Revolution across time in The House of Government. This article adds to the methodological insights of urban researchers by honing in on the Monument to the Revolution in Mexico City, in order to consider its role as a socially produced, conflictual and dynamically changing site in the struggle over public space and its memorialization. Since its opening in 1938, the Monument to the Revolution at Plaza de la República has been a pivotal fulcrum of state power in abetting the changing geography of state space. Equally, the site has experienced contradictions and differences stemming from socially produced space across time, in the form of periods of state crisis and, most recently, state ‘rollback’ and ‘rollout’ under neo-liberalization. This article addresses both neo-liberalizing and differential structures of feeling as they bear on the space at the Monument to the Revolution. It does so by situating the Monument to the Revolution within the urban question and how neo-liberalization has unlocked local and aesthetic meanings that have become commodified, not least through the extraction of monopoly rents. Further, the article spotlights simultaneous contemporary contestations of state power and impulses of socio-spatial struggle over difference articulated in and around Plaza de la República at the monument. In so doing, the article contributes an important pedagogical focus on both homogenizing and differential structures of feeling inscribed in spaces of capitalism in the twenty-first century.","PeriodicalId":311280,"journal":{"name":"Art & the Public Sphere","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Art & the Public Sphere","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1386/aps_00059_1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Recent contributions to urban geography have considered state space by innovatively focusing on specific cases of the city built environment. Examples could include here Karl Schlögel’s slicing through the spaces of state power in Moscow 1937 or Yuri Slezkine’s methodological cue to read the saga of the Russian Revolution across time in The House of Government. This article adds to the methodological insights of urban researchers by honing in on the Monument to the Revolution in Mexico City, in order to consider its role as a socially produced, conflictual and dynamically changing site in the struggle over public space and its memorialization. Since its opening in 1938, the Monument to the Revolution at Plaza de la República has been a pivotal fulcrum of state power in abetting the changing geography of state space. Equally, the site has experienced contradictions and differences stemming from socially produced space across time, in the form of periods of state crisis and, most recently, state ‘rollback’ and ‘rollout’ under neo-liberalization. This article addresses both neo-liberalizing and differential structures of feeling as they bear on the space at the Monument to the Revolution. It does so by situating the Monument to the Revolution within the urban question and how neo-liberalization has unlocked local and aesthetic meanings that have become commodified, not least through the extraction of monopoly rents. Further, the article spotlights simultaneous contemporary contestations of state power and impulses of socio-spatial struggle over difference articulated in and around Plaza de la República at the monument. In so doing, the article contributes an important pedagogical focus on both homogenizing and differential structures of feeling inscribed in spaces of capitalism in the twenty-first century.
最近对城市地理学的贡献通过创新地关注城市建筑环境的具体案例来考虑状态空间。例子可以包括卡尔Schlögel在1937年莫斯科的国家权力空间的切割,或者尤里·斯雷兹金的方法提示,在政府的议院中阅读俄国革命的传奇。本文通过对墨西哥城革命纪念碑的研究,增加了城市研究人员的方法论见解,以考虑其在公共空间及其纪念斗争中作为社会生产,冲突和动态变化的场所的作用。自1938年开放以来,位于Plaza de la República的革命纪念碑一直是国家权力的关键支点,以教唆性地改变国家空间的地理位置。同样,该网站也经历了矛盾和差异,这些矛盾和差异源于跨越时间的社会生产空间,以国家危机时期的形式,以及最近在新自由化下的国家“回滚”和“推出”。这篇文章讨论了新自由主义和不同的感觉结构,因为它们对革命纪念碑的空间有影响。它通过将革命纪念碑置于城市问题中,以及新自由化如何释放已经商品化的地方和美学意义来实现这一点,尤其是通过榨取垄断租金。此外,这篇文章同时强调了国家权力的当代争论和社会空间斗争的冲动,在纪念碑的Plaza de la República及其周围表达了差异。在这样做的过程中,这篇文章对21世纪资本主义空间中情感的同质化和差异结构做出了重要的教学关注。