{"title":"Avsluttende oppfordringer","authors":"C. Bachke, Mads Hermansen","doi":"10.23865/noasp.109.ch16a","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this call-to-action chapter, Roar C. Pettersen’s reflections in chapter 16 serve as a starting point for summarizing some of the general issues in the book that should be of interest not only to docents, but also other actors in the academic field. Seven points are touched on. (1) The poorly defined docent position, and (2) the constant pro and con discussions associated with the position; (3) the didactic competence of the docents as a key to improved quality of teaching; (4) the differing career ladders of professor and docent seen as an advantage or a challenge, and (5) how to galvanize synergy; (6) who within the landscape of higher education is responsible for implementing change; and (7) how to increase recruitment of docents. The editors do not present clear answers or easy solutions. Rather, they openly invite discussion on these issues. At the same time, they envision a climate in which professors and docents join hands in the same research project as a wishful way to bridge the gap between the two positions, and thereby create synergy.","PeriodicalId":305747,"journal":{"name":"Å satse på dosenter","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Å satse på dosenter","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23865/noasp.109.ch16a","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In this call-to-action chapter, Roar C. Pettersen’s reflections in chapter 16 serve as a starting point for summarizing some of the general issues in the book that should be of interest not only to docents, but also other actors in the academic field. Seven points are touched on. (1) The poorly defined docent position, and (2) the constant pro and con discussions associated with the position; (3) the didactic competence of the docents as a key to improved quality of teaching; (4) the differing career ladders of professor and docent seen as an advantage or a challenge, and (5) how to galvanize synergy; (6) who within the landscape of higher education is responsible for implementing change; and (7) how to increase recruitment of docents. The editors do not present clear answers or easy solutions. Rather, they openly invite discussion on these issues. At the same time, they envision a climate in which professors and docents join hands in the same research project as a wishful way to bridge the gap between the two positions, and thereby create synergy.
在这一呼吁行动的章节中,Roar C. Pettersen在第16章中的反思作为一个起点,总结了本书中一些一般性问题,这些问题不仅应该引起讲解员的兴趣,而且应该引起学术领域其他参与者的兴趣。其中涉及了七个要点。(1)不明确的讲解员位置,以及(2)与该位置相关的持续的赞成和反对讨论;(3)讲解员的教学能力是提高教学质量的关键;(4)教授和讲解员的不同职业阶梯被视为优势或挑战;(5)如何激发协同效应;(6)高等教育领域内谁负责实施变革;(7)如何加大对讲解员的招聘力度。编者没有给出明确的答案或简单的解决方案。相反,他们公开邀请讨论这些问题。与此同时,他们设想一种氛围,即教授和讲解员在同一个研究项目中携手合作,作为弥合两个职位之间差距的一种理想方式,从而创造协同效应。