HIGHER-ORDER THINKING SKILLS ON TEACHERS-MADE TESTS BY ENGLISH TEACHERS OF A SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL IN BENGKULU CITY

Serla Apriana, A. Lubis, Dedi Sofyan
{"title":"HIGHER-ORDER THINKING SKILLS ON TEACHERS-MADE TESTS BY ENGLISH TEACHERS OF A SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL IN BENGKULU CITY","authors":"Serla Apriana, A. Lubis, Dedi Sofyan","doi":"10.20527/jetall.v5i2.13462","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The objectives of this study are to investigate the composition of Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) on the English teacher-made test based on the revised Bloom’s taxonomy and investigating the quality of the teacher-made tests viewed from the composition of HOTS. This study was a content analysis that used a triangulation design: data transformation model mixed method approach. The data of this study were teacher-made test sets that consisted of 136 questions. The data were analyzed by understanding the operational verbs used in each item of the teacher-made test based on the cognitive domain of revised Bloom’s taxonomy. Then, data were put in a checklist table based in each cognitive domain category. After that, the data were calculated quantitatively and interpreted qualitatively. The results show that the composition of HOTS was lower than the Lower Order Thinking Skills (LOTS) of all questions on the teacher-made tests. The most frequent cognitive domain of the Bloom’s taxonomy found on the teacher-made test was C2 (Understand), followed by C4 (Analyze), C3 (Apply), C1 (Remember), C5 (Evaluate), and C6 (Create). Moreover, the quality of the teacher-made tests viewed from the composition of HOTS was in a less proportional criterion. In conclusion, the findings indicate constructing a test based on the principles of HOTS seem still problematic for Senior High School English teachers.","PeriodicalId":233420,"journal":{"name":"Journal of English Teaching, Applied Linguistics and Literatures (JETALL)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of English Teaching, Applied Linguistics and Literatures (JETALL)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20527/jetall.v5i2.13462","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The objectives of this study are to investigate the composition of Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) on the English teacher-made test based on the revised Bloom’s taxonomy and investigating the quality of the teacher-made tests viewed from the composition of HOTS. This study was a content analysis that used a triangulation design: data transformation model mixed method approach. The data of this study were teacher-made test sets that consisted of 136 questions. The data were analyzed by understanding the operational verbs used in each item of the teacher-made test based on the cognitive domain of revised Bloom’s taxonomy. Then, data were put in a checklist table based in each cognitive domain category. After that, the data were calculated quantitatively and interpreted qualitatively. The results show that the composition of HOTS was lower than the Lower Order Thinking Skills (LOTS) of all questions on the teacher-made tests. The most frequent cognitive domain of the Bloom’s taxonomy found on the teacher-made test was C2 (Understand), followed by C4 (Analyze), C3 (Apply), C1 (Remember), C5 (Evaluate), and C6 (Create). Moreover, the quality of the teacher-made tests viewed from the composition of HOTS was in a less proportional criterion. In conclusion, the findings indicate constructing a test based on the principles of HOTS seem still problematic for Senior High School English teachers.
白古鲁市一所高中英语教师所做的高阶思维能力测试
本研究的目的是基于修订后的Bloom分类,探讨高阶思维技能(HOTS)在英语教师自编测验中的构成,并从高阶思维技能的构成来看教师自编测验的质量。本研究采用三角设计:数据转换模型混合方法进行内容分析。本研究的数据是由教师制作的测试集,包含136个问题。根据修订后的Bloom分类法的认知域,通过理解教师编写的测试中每个项目中使用的操作动词来分析数据。然后,将数据放入基于每个认知领域类别的检查表中。然后对数据进行定量计算和定性解释。结果表明,学生的HOTS的构成低于教师自编测试中所有问题的低阶思维技能(lot)。在老师设计的测试中,布鲁姆分类中最常见的认知领域是C2(理解),其次是C4(分析)、C3(应用)、C1(记住)、C5(评估)和C6(创建)。此外,从HOTS的组成来看,教师自编考试的质量是一个比例较小的标准。综上所述,研究结果表明,基于HOTS的原则构建高中英语教师的测试仍然存在问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信