OPTIMISING SURVEYS AND RELIABILITY ASSESSMENTS OF HISTORIC CAST-IRON COLUMNS

K. Jung, J. Marková, M. Sýkora
{"title":"OPTIMISING SURVEYS AND RELIABILITY ASSESSMENTS OF HISTORIC CAST-IRON COLUMNS","authors":"K. Jung, J. Marková, M. Sýkora","doi":"10.2495/HPSM180081","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Cast iron structures mostly date back to the second half of the 19th century. Material properties vary due to different composition and production techniques that have been used in different regions over decades. This is why it is of crucial importance to obtain case-specific information on properties of historic structures. Many historic metal structures do not fulfil requirements of present standards. Decisions about adequate construction interventions should be based on complex assessment of structural reliability. In this contribution, the material properties of an iron column are investigated and the key considerations for reliability assessment are presented. Three fundamental issues are addressed to optimise surveys and reliability assessments of cast iron columns: 1) an optimum number of material tests; 2) the selection between a finite element (FE) and analytical model; and 3) the target reliability level for a historic structure. It is shown that uncertainties due to limited test data, variability of material and geometrical properties, and resistance model uncertainty can be treated by a semi-probabilistic verification method. As a first approximation, five tensile tests might be considered as an optimum survey strategy. The application of FE models is more demanding than that of simplified analytical formulas, but it can better reflect structure-specific conditions and may increase structural resistance by about 15%. Optimum target reliability level for existing structures with a cultural heritage value could be lower than that for structural design and the assessment value of resistance may increase by about 20% for a reduced target level.","PeriodicalId":340058,"journal":{"name":"High Performance and Optimum Design of Structures and Materials III","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"High Performance and Optimum Design of Structures and Materials III","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2495/HPSM180081","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Cast iron structures mostly date back to the second half of the 19th century. Material properties vary due to different composition and production techniques that have been used in different regions over decades. This is why it is of crucial importance to obtain case-specific information on properties of historic structures. Many historic metal structures do not fulfil requirements of present standards. Decisions about adequate construction interventions should be based on complex assessment of structural reliability. In this contribution, the material properties of an iron column are investigated and the key considerations for reliability assessment are presented. Three fundamental issues are addressed to optimise surveys and reliability assessments of cast iron columns: 1) an optimum number of material tests; 2) the selection between a finite element (FE) and analytical model; and 3) the target reliability level for a historic structure. It is shown that uncertainties due to limited test data, variability of material and geometrical properties, and resistance model uncertainty can be treated by a semi-probabilistic verification method. As a first approximation, five tensile tests might be considered as an optimum survey strategy. The application of FE models is more demanding than that of simplified analytical formulas, but it can better reflect structure-specific conditions and may increase structural resistance by about 15%. Optimum target reliability level for existing structures with a cultural heritage value could be lower than that for structural design and the assessment value of resistance may increase by about 20% for a reduced target level.
优化历史铸铁柱的调查和可靠性评估
铸铁结构大多可以追溯到19世纪下半叶。由于不同的成分和生产技术在不同的地区使用了几十年,材料的性质也有所不同。这就是为什么获取历史建筑属性的具体案例信息至关重要的原因。许多历史悠久的金属结构不符合现行标准的要求。有关适当施工干预措施的决定应基于对结构可靠性的复杂评估。在这篇文章中,研究了铁柱的材料性能,并提出了可靠性评估的关键考虑因素。解决了三个基本问题,以优化铸铁柱的调查和可靠性评估:1)材料试验的最佳数量;2)有限元模型与解析模型的选择;3)历史建筑的目标可靠度水平。结果表明,试验数据的有限性、材料和几何特性的可变性以及电阻模型的不确定性均可通过半概率验证方法加以处理。作为第一个近似,五次拉伸试验可能被认为是最佳的测量策略。有限元模型的应用比简化解析公式的应用要求更高,但能更好地反映结构的具体情况,并可使结构阻力提高15%左右。具有文化遗产价值的既有结构的最佳目标可靠度水平可能低于结构设计的最佳目标可靠度水平,降低目标可靠度水平后,阻力评估值可能增加约20%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信