Evaluation of Site of Perforation among Secondary Peritonitis Cases and its Association with Outcome in a Tertiary Care Hospital

P. Thakur, U. K. Chandel, A. Kaundal
{"title":"Evaluation of Site of Perforation among Secondary Peritonitis Cases and its Association with Outcome in a Tertiary Care Hospital","authors":"P. Thakur, U. K. Chandel, A. Kaundal","doi":"10.47310/iarjs.2022.v02i04.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The present study was carried out to evaluate the Site of Perforation among Secondary Peritonitis cases and its association with outcome in a tertiary care Hospital. Material and Methods: This cross sectional study was conducted by Department of Surgery, IGMC, Shimla over a period of twelve months from January 2021 – December 2021 among patients with a diagnosis of secondary peritonitis after fulfilling the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Relevant information was collected and further analysed by using IBM SPSS Statistics. Results: A total of 250 individuals with a diagnosis of perforation peritonitis were assessed in the current study. Males made up 205 (82%) of the total while females made up 45 (18%). The patients' average age was 47.28 17.34 years, ranging from 18 to 87. In the study, 99 (39.6%) of the total patients were under the age of 40, while 151 (60.4%) were beyond the age of 40. Of the total, 32 (12.80%) passed away while 218 (87.20%) were discharged after receiving treatment. The Most common cause was Duodenal perforation among 91 patients (36.4%), Gastric perforation among 83 patients (33.2%), Ileal perforation among 32 patients (12.8%), Jejunal perforation among 16 patients (6.4%) and Other among 28 patients (11.2%). Among the patients who expired due to Secondary Peritonitis, maximum 12(37.5%) had Gastric Perforation followed by Duodenal Perforation in 9 (28.1%) patients. Conclusion: The study concluded that most of patients of secondary peritonitis had Duodenal perforation followed by Gastric perforation. The most common type of perforation among patients who died from secondary peritonitis was gastric followed by duodenal.","PeriodicalId":299013,"journal":{"name":"International Academic Research Journal of Surgery","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Academic Research Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47310/iarjs.2022.v02i04.003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The present study was carried out to evaluate the Site of Perforation among Secondary Peritonitis cases and its association with outcome in a tertiary care Hospital. Material and Methods: This cross sectional study was conducted by Department of Surgery, IGMC, Shimla over a period of twelve months from January 2021 – December 2021 among patients with a diagnosis of secondary peritonitis after fulfilling the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Relevant information was collected and further analysed by using IBM SPSS Statistics. Results: A total of 250 individuals with a diagnosis of perforation peritonitis were assessed in the current study. Males made up 205 (82%) of the total while females made up 45 (18%). The patients' average age was 47.28 17.34 years, ranging from 18 to 87. In the study, 99 (39.6%) of the total patients were under the age of 40, while 151 (60.4%) were beyond the age of 40. Of the total, 32 (12.80%) passed away while 218 (87.20%) were discharged after receiving treatment. The Most common cause was Duodenal perforation among 91 patients (36.4%), Gastric perforation among 83 patients (33.2%), Ileal perforation among 32 patients (12.8%), Jejunal perforation among 16 patients (6.4%) and Other among 28 patients (11.2%). Among the patients who expired due to Secondary Peritonitis, maximum 12(37.5%) had Gastric Perforation followed by Duodenal Perforation in 9 (28.1%) patients. Conclusion: The study concluded that most of patients of secondary peritonitis had Duodenal perforation followed by Gastric perforation. The most common type of perforation among patients who died from secondary peritonitis was gastric followed by duodenal.
一家三级医院继发性腹膜炎穿孔部位的评价及其与预后的关系
背景:本研究旨在评估一家三级医院继发性腹膜炎患者穿孔部位及其与预后的关系。材料和方法:本横断面研究由西姆拉IGMC外科部门于2021年1月至2021年12月期间在符合纳入和排除标准后诊断为继发性腹膜炎的患者中进行。收集相关资料,运用IBM SPSS统计软件进行分析。结果:在目前的研究中,共有250名诊断为穿孔性腹膜炎的个体进行了评估。男性占205人(82%),女性占45人(18%)。患者平均年龄47.28 ~ 17.34岁,年龄18 ~ 87岁。本组患者中,年龄在40岁以下的有99例(39.6%),年龄在40岁以上的有151例(60.4%)。其中死亡32例(12.80%),经治疗出院218例(87.20%)。病因以十二指肠穿孔91例(36.4%)、胃穿孔83例(33.2%)、回肠穿孔32例(12.8%)、空肠穿孔16例(6.4%)、其他28例(11.2%)为主。继发性腹膜炎死亡的患者中,胃穿孔最多12例(37.5%),其次是十二指肠穿孔9例(28.1%)。结论:继发性腹膜炎以十二指肠穿孔为主,其次为胃穿孔。在继发性腹膜炎死亡的患者中,最常见的穿孔类型是胃穿孔,其次是十二指肠穿孔。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信