The best defense is a good defense: adapting negotiation methods for tackling pressure over software project estimates

P. Matsubara, Igor Steinmacher, B. Gadelha, T. Conte
{"title":"The best defense is a good defense: adapting negotiation methods for tackling pressure over software project estimates","authors":"P. Matsubara, Igor Steinmacher, B. Gadelha, T. Conte","doi":"10.1145/3510455.3512775","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Software estimation is critical for a software project’s success and a challenging activity. We argue that estimation problems are not restricted to the generation of estimates but also their use for commitment establishment: project stakeholders pressure estimators to change their estimates or to accept unrealistic commitments to attain business goals. In this study, we employed a Design Science Research (DSR) methodology to design an artifact based on negotiation methods, to empower software estimators in defending their estimates and searching for alternatives to unrealistic commitments when facing pressure. The artifact is a concrete step towards disseminating the soft skill of negotiation among practitioners. We present the preliminary results from a focus group that showed that practitioners from the software industry could use the artifact in a concrete scenario when estimating and establishing commitments about a software project. Our future steps include improving the artifact with the suggestions from focus group participants and evaluating it empirically in real software projects in the industry. CCS CONCEPTS • Software and its engineering → Software development process management.","PeriodicalId":416186,"journal":{"name":"2022 IEEE/ACM 44th International Conference on Software Engineering: New Ideas and Emerging Results (ICSE-NIER)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 IEEE/ACM 44th International Conference on Software Engineering: New Ideas and Emerging Results (ICSE-NIER)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3510455.3512775","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Software estimation is critical for a software project’s success and a challenging activity. We argue that estimation problems are not restricted to the generation of estimates but also their use for commitment establishment: project stakeholders pressure estimators to change their estimates or to accept unrealistic commitments to attain business goals. In this study, we employed a Design Science Research (DSR) methodology to design an artifact based on negotiation methods, to empower software estimators in defending their estimates and searching for alternatives to unrealistic commitments when facing pressure. The artifact is a concrete step towards disseminating the soft skill of negotiation among practitioners. We present the preliminary results from a focus group that showed that practitioners from the software industry could use the artifact in a concrete scenario when estimating and establishing commitments about a software project. Our future steps include improving the artifact with the suggestions from focus group participants and evaluating it empirically in real software projects in the industry. CCS CONCEPTS • Software and its engineering → Software development process management.
最好的防御是一个好的防御:调整协商方法来处理软件项目评估的压力
软件评估对于软件项目的成功是至关重要的,也是一项具有挑战性的活动。我们认为,评估问题并不局限于评估的产生,还局限于它们对承诺建立的使用:项目涉众迫使评估人员改变他们的评估,或者接受不切实际的承诺来实现业务目标。在这项研究中,我们采用了设计科学研究(DSR)方法来设计一个基于协商方法的工件,授权软件评估人员在面对压力时捍卫他们的评估并寻找不现实承诺的替代方案。工件是在从业者之间传播谈判软技能的具体步骤。我们展示了来自焦点小组的初步结果,这些结果表明,当评估和建立关于软件项目的承诺时,来自软件行业的从业者可以在具体的场景中使用工件。我们未来的步骤包括根据焦点小组参与者的建议改进工件,并在行业中的实际软件项目中对其进行经验评估。•软件及其工程→软件开发过程管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信