Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) versus single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT/CT) in painful total hip arthroplasty: a comparative multiinstitutional analysis.

Henrik Bäcker, Isabelle Steurer-Dober, M. Beck, C. Agten, J. Decking, R. Herzog, J. Geller, U. Bhure, J. Roos, K. Strobel
{"title":"Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) versus single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT/CT) in painful total hip arthroplasty: a comparative multiinstitutional analysis.","authors":"Henrik Bäcker, Isabelle Steurer-Dober, M. Beck, C. Agten, J. Decking, R. Herzog, J. Geller, U. Bhure, J. Roos, K. Strobel","doi":"10.1259/bjr.20190738","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE\nTo investigate the value of MRI in comparison to single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT)/CT in patients with painful hip arthroplasties.\n\n\nMETHODS\nA prospective, multi-institutional study was performed. Therefore, 35 consecutive patients (21 female, 14 male, mean age 61.8 ± 13.3 years) with 37-painful hip arthroplasties were included. A hip surgeon noted the most likely diagnosis based on clinical examination and hip radiographs. Then, MRI and SPECT/CT of the painful hips were acquired. MRI and SPECT/CT were assessed for loosening, infection, fracture, tendon pathology and other abnormalities. Final diagnosis and therapy was established by the hip surgeon after integration of MRI and SPECT/CT results. The value of MRI and SPECT/CT for diagnosis was assessed with a 3-point scale (1 = unimportant, 2 = helpful, 3 = essential).\n\n\nRESULTS\nLoosening was observed in 13/37 arthroplasties (6 shaft only, 6 cup only, 1 combined). Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value for loosening of MRI were 86%/88%/60%/100% and of SPECT/CT 93%/97%/905/100%, respectively. MRI and SPECT/CT diagnosed infection correctly in two of three patients and fractures in two patients, which were missed by X-ray. MRI detected soft tissue abnormalities in 21 patients (6 bursitis, 14 tendon lesions, 1 pseudotumor), of which only 1 tendon abnormality was accurately detected with SPECT/CT. All 5 arthroplasties with polyethylene wear were correctly diagnosed clinically and with both imaging modalities. MRI and SPECT/CT were judged as not helpful in 0/0%, as helpful in 16%/49% and essential in 84%/51%.\n\n\nCONCLUSION\nIn patients with painful hip arthroplasty SPECT/CT is slightly superior to MR in the assessment of loosening. MRI is far superior in the detection of soft tissue, especially tendon pathologies.\n\n\nADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE\nTo our knowledge this is the first prospective, multiinstitutional study which compares MRI with SPECT/CT in painful hip arthroplasties. We found that MRI is far superior in the detection of soft tissue pathologies, whereas in painful hip arthroplasties the SPECT/CT remains slightly superior. In future, new MR sequences may allow detecting arthroplasty loosening or infection with high accuracy.","PeriodicalId":226783,"journal":{"name":"The British journal of radiology","volume":"153 5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"17","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The British journal of radiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20190738","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17

Abstract

OBJECTIVE To investigate the value of MRI in comparison to single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT)/CT in patients with painful hip arthroplasties. METHODS A prospective, multi-institutional study was performed. Therefore, 35 consecutive patients (21 female, 14 male, mean age 61.8 ± 13.3 years) with 37-painful hip arthroplasties were included. A hip surgeon noted the most likely diagnosis based on clinical examination and hip radiographs. Then, MRI and SPECT/CT of the painful hips were acquired. MRI and SPECT/CT were assessed for loosening, infection, fracture, tendon pathology and other abnormalities. Final diagnosis and therapy was established by the hip surgeon after integration of MRI and SPECT/CT results. The value of MRI and SPECT/CT for diagnosis was assessed with a 3-point scale (1 = unimportant, 2 = helpful, 3 = essential). RESULTS Loosening was observed in 13/37 arthroplasties (6 shaft only, 6 cup only, 1 combined). Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value for loosening of MRI were 86%/88%/60%/100% and of SPECT/CT 93%/97%/905/100%, respectively. MRI and SPECT/CT diagnosed infection correctly in two of three patients and fractures in two patients, which were missed by X-ray. MRI detected soft tissue abnormalities in 21 patients (6 bursitis, 14 tendon lesions, 1 pseudotumor), of which only 1 tendon abnormality was accurately detected with SPECT/CT. All 5 arthroplasties with polyethylene wear were correctly diagnosed clinically and with both imaging modalities. MRI and SPECT/CT were judged as not helpful in 0/0%, as helpful in 16%/49% and essential in 84%/51%. CONCLUSION In patients with painful hip arthroplasty SPECT/CT is slightly superior to MR in the assessment of loosening. MRI is far superior in the detection of soft tissue, especially tendon pathologies. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE To our knowledge this is the first prospective, multiinstitutional study which compares MRI with SPECT/CT in painful hip arthroplasties. We found that MRI is far superior in the detection of soft tissue pathologies, whereas in painful hip arthroplasties the SPECT/CT remains slightly superior. In future, new MR sequences may allow detecting arthroplasty loosening or infection with high accuracy.
磁共振成像(MRI)与单光子发射计算机断层扫描(SPECT/CT)在疼痛性全髋关节置换术中的应用:一项多机构比较分析。
目的探讨MRI与单光子发射计算机断层扫描(SPECT)/CT在疼痛性髋关节置换术中的应用价值。方法采用前瞻性、多机构研究。因此,我们纳入了连续35例(女性21例,男性14例,平均年龄61.8±13.3岁)37例疼痛的髋关节置换术患者。一位髋关节外科医生根据临床检查和髋关节x光片指出了最可能的诊断。然后对疼痛髋进行MRI和SPECT/CT检查。评估MRI和SPECT/CT是否有松动、感染、骨折、肌腱病理及其他异常。最终的诊断和治疗由髋关节外科医生在综合MRI和SPECT/CT结果后确定。MRI和SPECT/CT的诊断价值采用3分制评估(1 =不重要,2 =有用,3 =必要)。结果37例关节置换术中有13例出现松动(仅轴6例,仅杯6例,合并1例)。MRI对松动的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值分别为86%/88%/60%/100%,SPECT/CT为93%/97%/905/100%。MRI和SPECT/CT正确诊断3例患者中2例感染,2例骨折,x线未诊断。MRI检出软组织异常21例(滑囊炎6例,肌腱病变14例,假性肿瘤1例),其中SPECT/CT仅准确检出1例肌腱异常。5例伴聚乙烯磨损的关节置换术均得到了正确的临床诊断和两种影像学检查。判断MRI和SPECT/CT无帮助的比例为0/0%,判断有用的比例为16%/49%,判断必要的比例为84%/51%。结论在疼痛性髋关节置换术患者中,SPECT/CT评估关节松动程度略优于MR。MRI在软组织,尤其是肌腱病变的检测上是非常优越的。据我们所知,这是第一个前瞻性的、多机构的研究,比较了MRI和SPECT/CT在疼痛髋关节置换术中的应用。我们发现,MRI在软组织病变的检测方面远远优于SPECT/CT,而在疼痛的髋关节置换术中,SPECT/CT仍然稍微优于MRI。未来,新的MR序列可能允许以高精度检测关节置换术松动或感染。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信