A ‘conspicuous success’? Policing Liverpool and Manchester in July 1981

Simon Peplow
{"title":"A ‘conspicuous success’? Policing Liverpool and Manchester in July 1981","authors":"Simon Peplow","doi":"10.7228/manchester/9781526125286.003.0007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter examines some key policing developments of the 1980–1 disorders, focussing upon Toxteth, Liverpool and Moss Side, Manchester through interviews and original local records. Reaction to previous disturbances strengthened police tactics and riot control equipment, with this transformation demonstrated by the first use of CS gas within mainland Britain and suggestions of arming the police or mobilising the army; radical black groups even alleged the police instigated the July disorders to justify enhanced equipment and ‘stronger’ police tactics. In Moss Side, during a contentious meeting between local community organisations and the police, apparent advances in the police/community relationship were alleged to have actually been a ploy to justify a forceful police response to disorder, employing tactics modelled upon Northern Ireland examples – including using police vehicles to disperse crowds, and ‘snatch squads’ targeting influential participants. Authorities again framed disturbances around law and order, rather than addressing broader issues of racism, discrimination, or their economic and social policies; Manchester Chief Constable James Anderton’s actions were described by the government as a ‘conspicuous success’, but did little to improve poor police/black relations at the heart of spreading disturbances.","PeriodicalId":275693,"journal":{"name":"Race and riots in Thatcher's Britain","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Race and riots in Thatcher's Britain","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7228/manchester/9781526125286.003.0007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This chapter examines some key policing developments of the 1980–1 disorders, focussing upon Toxteth, Liverpool and Moss Side, Manchester through interviews and original local records. Reaction to previous disturbances strengthened police tactics and riot control equipment, with this transformation demonstrated by the first use of CS gas within mainland Britain and suggestions of arming the police or mobilising the army; radical black groups even alleged the police instigated the July disorders to justify enhanced equipment and ‘stronger’ police tactics. In Moss Side, during a contentious meeting between local community organisations and the police, apparent advances in the police/community relationship were alleged to have actually been a ploy to justify a forceful police response to disorder, employing tactics modelled upon Northern Ireland examples – including using police vehicles to disperse crowds, and ‘snatch squads’ targeting influential participants. Authorities again framed disturbances around law and order, rather than addressing broader issues of racism, discrimination, or their economic and social policies; Manchester Chief Constable James Anderton’s actions were described by the government as a ‘conspicuous success’, but did little to improve poor police/black relations at the heart of spreading disturbances.
“显著的成功”?1981年7月担任利物浦和曼彻斯特警察
本章通过采访和原始的当地记录,考察了1980-1年骚乱的一些关键警务发展,重点关注了托克斯泰斯、利物浦和曼彻斯特的莫斯赛德。对先前骚乱的反应加强了警察的战术和防暴设备,这种转变体现在英国大陆首次使用CS气体,并建议武装警察或动员军队;激进的黑人团体甚至声称警察煽动了7月的骚乱,以证明加强装备和“更强硬”的警察策略是合理的。在Moss Side,在当地社区组织和警察之间的一次有争议的会议期间,据称警察/社区关系的明显进展实际上是一种策略,目的是证明警察对骚乱的强力反应是合理的,采用了模仿北爱尔兰的例子的策略——包括使用警车驱散人群,以及针对有影响力的参与者的“抢夺小队”。当局再次围绕法律和秩序制造骚乱,而不是解决更广泛的种族主义、歧视或其经济和社会政策问题;曼彻斯特警察局局长詹姆斯·安德顿(James Anderton)的行动被政府描述为“显著的成功”,但对改善警察与黑人之间糟糕的关系收效甚微,而这正是骚乱蔓延的核心所在。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信