{"title":"Canonical complexity","authors":"J. Nichols","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198861287.003.0007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter proposes canonical complexity as a counterpart to enumerative/taxonomic/inventory complexity. While enumerative complexity measures complexity as the number of elements, features, values, etc., in a system, canonical complexity counts the number of departures from what is canonical, and provides a usable measure of non-transparency and inconsistency in that system. The chapter lays out the definitions, terms, domains, and criteria for measuring the canonical complexity of a representative sample of inflectional morphology in nouns, pronouns, and verbs. Applied to a 113-language worldwide sample, it shows that canonical and enumerative complexity are independent of each other and hence can function as distinct typological features; there are large-scale distributional trends of interest especially in the northern hemisphere; and canonical complexity levels appear to correlate well with the sociolinguistics of isolation vs. expansion.","PeriodicalId":338724,"journal":{"name":"The Complexities of Morphology","volume":"15 2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Complexities of Morphology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198861287.003.0007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
This chapter proposes canonical complexity as a counterpart to enumerative/taxonomic/inventory complexity. While enumerative complexity measures complexity as the number of elements, features, values, etc., in a system, canonical complexity counts the number of departures from what is canonical, and provides a usable measure of non-transparency and inconsistency in that system. The chapter lays out the definitions, terms, domains, and criteria for measuring the canonical complexity of a representative sample of inflectional morphology in nouns, pronouns, and verbs. Applied to a 113-language worldwide sample, it shows that canonical and enumerative complexity are independent of each other and hence can function as distinct typological features; there are large-scale distributional trends of interest especially in the northern hemisphere; and canonical complexity levels appear to correlate well with the sociolinguistics of isolation vs. expansion.