{"title":"\"Objects Insignificant to Sight\": Racial Violence and Empathy in Faulkner's \"Pantaloon in Black\"","authors":"John Lutz","doi":"10.1353/fau.2019.0020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"An effort to lay bare the root causes of the empathy deficiency that enables the brutal practice of lynching lies at the very center of William Faulkner’s short masterpiece “Pantaloon in Black.” First published in 1940 as a chapter in the novel Go Down, Moses, “Pantaloon in Black” confronts the underlying psychological and social forces that legitimize lynching by humanizing its central African American character, Rider. Recent discoveries in neuroscience and social psychology concerning empathy can provide a useful vantage point for understanding Faulkner’s critique of racist violence in “Pantaloon in Black” and in Go Down, Moses more generally. The preponderance of evidence from these fields demonstrates that our emotional responses to the pain of others are hardwired into our brains and frequently felt with an involuntary immediacy over which we have little control. Feeling with others is a spontaneous, natural feature of our common humanity, a biological inheritance most likely developed as an adaptive trait in the process of human evolution. However, if our empathic responses to others are indeed a common biological inheritance, then how do we explain the apparent suspension of such responses in the inflicting of racist violence? In his research into empathic accuracy, William Ickes notes how negative frames of reference that “become inflexible, unyielding, and irrecon-","PeriodicalId":208802,"journal":{"name":"The Faulkner Journal","volume":"105 1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Faulkner Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/fau.2019.0020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
An effort to lay bare the root causes of the empathy deficiency that enables the brutal practice of lynching lies at the very center of William Faulkner’s short masterpiece “Pantaloon in Black.” First published in 1940 as a chapter in the novel Go Down, Moses, “Pantaloon in Black” confronts the underlying psychological and social forces that legitimize lynching by humanizing its central African American character, Rider. Recent discoveries in neuroscience and social psychology concerning empathy can provide a useful vantage point for understanding Faulkner’s critique of racist violence in “Pantaloon in Black” and in Go Down, Moses more generally. The preponderance of evidence from these fields demonstrates that our emotional responses to the pain of others are hardwired into our brains and frequently felt with an involuntary immediacy over which we have little control. Feeling with others is a spontaneous, natural feature of our common humanity, a biological inheritance most likely developed as an adaptive trait in the process of human evolution. However, if our empathic responses to others are indeed a common biological inheritance, then how do we explain the apparent suspension of such responses in the inflicting of racist violence? In his research into empathic accuracy, William Ickes notes how negative frames of reference that “become inflexible, unyielding, and irrecon-
威廉·福克纳(William Faulkner)的短篇杰作《黑衣小丑》(Pantaloon in Black)的核心,是揭露导致残忍的私刑行为的移情缺失的根本原因。《黑衣小丑》于1940年作为小说《摩西,下去吧》的一个章节首次出版,它通过人性化的刻画黑人主角莱德,直面使私刑合法化的潜在心理和社会力量。最近在神经科学和社会心理学中关于移情的发现,可以为理解福克纳在《黑衣小丑》和《摩西下去》中对种族主义暴力的批判提供一个有用的有利位置。来自这些领域的大量证据表明,我们对他人痛苦的情绪反应根植于我们的大脑中,并且经常以一种我们几乎无法控制的无意识的直接感受。与他人的感情是我们共同人性的一种自发的、自然的特征,是一种生物遗传,最有可能在人类进化过程中作为一种适应特征而发展起来。然而,如果我们对他人的移情反应确实是一种共同的生物遗传,那么我们如何解释在施加种族主义暴力时这种反应的明显中止?威廉·伊克斯(William Ickes)在对移情准确性的研究中指出,消极的参照系是如何“变得不灵活、不屈和盲目”的