ENSAIOS METAMÓRFICOS DO TRANSCAPITALISMO PÓS-HUMANO. APONTAMENTOS REFLEXIVOS SOBRE O IDEÁRIO TRANSHUMANISTA.

Victor César Fernandes
{"title":"ENSAIOS METAMÓRFICOS DO TRANSCAPITALISMO PÓS-HUMANO. APONTAMENTOS REFLEXIVOS SOBRE\n O IDEÁRIO TRANSHUMANISTA.","authors":"Victor César Fernandes","doi":"10.5935/2179-9180.20190006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this article, we have the pretension to offer the thesis according to which transhumanism has been putting itself in the present time as a decisive field for the Marxism and battlefield privileged for the critical theory in the 21st century, essentially for the reason of being an “area of knowledge” the participation of theorists of this scope, for which we try to offer possible indications of our contribution. To substantiate this proposal, we will see that the theme of transhumanism brings with it some of the problems detected by Adorno in his controversies with Walter Benjamin about the aura problem regarding the relationship between society and nature. The aura will be articulated by us to the question of the permanence of the power of nature over society; would refer to the possibility of transcending nature, but would also manifest itself in the form of the dominating power that would prolong nature within society. In order to do so, we will briefly review the theoretical and political lines of the transhumanist debate and, finally, conclude that the absence of a Marxist debate coincides with some of the investments of the so-called trans-bourgeoisie, which remains untouched by some ideologues of this debate and possibly the metamorphic essays of post-human transcapitalism.","PeriodicalId":107480,"journal":{"name":"Revista Guairacá de Filosofia","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Guairacá de Filosofia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5935/2179-9180.20190006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this article, we have the pretension to offer the thesis according to which transhumanism has been putting itself in the present time as a decisive field for the Marxism and battlefield privileged for the critical theory in the 21st century, essentially for the reason of being an “area of knowledge” the participation of theorists of this scope, for which we try to offer possible indications of our contribution. To substantiate this proposal, we will see that the theme of transhumanism brings with it some of the problems detected by Adorno in his controversies with Walter Benjamin about the aura problem regarding the relationship between society and nature. The aura will be articulated by us to the question of the permanence of the power of nature over society; would refer to the possibility of transcending nature, but would also manifest itself in the form of the dominating power that would prolong nature within society. In order to do so, we will briefly review the theoretical and political lines of the transhumanist debate and, finally, conclude that the absence of a Marxist debate coincides with some of the investments of the so-called trans-bourgeoisie, which remains untouched by some ideologues of this debate and possibly the metamorphic essays of post-human transcapitalism.
后人类超资本主义的变形论。关于超人类主义思想的反思笔记。
在这篇文章中,我们试图提供这样一种论点,根据这种论点,超人类主义在目前已经把自己作为马克思主义的决定性领域和21世纪批判理论的特权战场,主要是因为它是一个“知识领域”,这一范围的理论家参与其中,为此我们试图提供我们贡献的可能迹象。为了证实这一建议,我们将看到,超人类主义的主题带来了阿多诺在他与瓦尔特·本雅明关于社会与自然关系的光环问题的争论中发现的一些问题。我们将把这个光环与自然对社会的力量的持久性问题联系起来;指的是超越自然的可能性,但也会以统治力量的形式表现出来,这将在社会中延长自然。为了做到这一点,我们将简要回顾超人类主义辩论的理论和政治路线,最后得出结论,马克思主义辩论的缺失与所谓的跨资产阶级的一些投资是一致的,这些投资仍未被这场辩论的一些理论家所触及,也可能被后人类跨资本主义的变质文章所触及。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信