Questions Classification Based on Revised Bloom's Taxonomy Cognitive Level using Naive Bayes and Support Vector Machine

Annisa Syafarani Callista, Oktariani Nurul Pratiwi, E. Sutoyo
{"title":"Questions Classification Based on Revised Bloom's Taxonomy Cognitive Level using Naive Bayes and Support Vector Machine","authors":"Annisa Syafarani Callista, Oktariani Nurul Pratiwi, E. Sutoyo","doi":"10.1109/ic2ie53219.2021.9649187","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Education is an essential aspect in building the social value and norm to produce individuals who can think in high order thinking through learning and teaching activities. As technology keeps growing, an online learning platform has emerged. This platform is called e-Learning. e-Learning allows teachers to save many questions into the e-Learning question bank. However, these questions need to be reviewed so the questions can be matched with the achievement of competence. One educational identification standard that is often to improve the quality of the questions is Bloom's Taxonomy. Bloom's Taxonomy was created in 1956 and revised in 2001. This study compares the performance of the Support Vector Machine and Naïve Bayes algorithms to classify quiz questions based on the cognitive level of Revised Bloom's Taxonomy. In this study, the dataset received two treatments in handling the imbalanced class. One dataset is using SMOTE method, and one another is not using any oversampling methods. The result shows that classification with oversampling datasets had better results than those without oversampling. The Support Vector Machine algorithm with SMOTE has the highest accuracy of 98%, rather than the Naïve Bayes algorithm with SMOTE has an accuracy of 91%.","PeriodicalId":178443,"journal":{"name":"2021 4th International Conference of Computer and Informatics Engineering (IC2IE)","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 4th International Conference of Computer and Informatics Engineering (IC2IE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ic2ie53219.2021.9649187","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Education is an essential aspect in building the social value and norm to produce individuals who can think in high order thinking through learning and teaching activities. As technology keeps growing, an online learning platform has emerged. This platform is called e-Learning. e-Learning allows teachers to save many questions into the e-Learning question bank. However, these questions need to be reviewed so the questions can be matched with the achievement of competence. One educational identification standard that is often to improve the quality of the questions is Bloom's Taxonomy. Bloom's Taxonomy was created in 1956 and revised in 2001. This study compares the performance of the Support Vector Machine and Naïve Bayes algorithms to classify quiz questions based on the cognitive level of Revised Bloom's Taxonomy. In this study, the dataset received two treatments in handling the imbalanced class. One dataset is using SMOTE method, and one another is not using any oversampling methods. The result shows that classification with oversampling datasets had better results than those without oversampling. The Support Vector Machine algorithm with SMOTE has the highest accuracy of 98%, rather than the Naïve Bayes algorithm with SMOTE has an accuracy of 91%.
基于朴素贝叶斯和支持向量机的修正Bloom分类法认知水平的问题分类
教育是通过教与学活动培养具有高阶思维能力的个体的社会价值和社会规范建设的重要环节。随着科技的不断发展,一种在线学习平台应运而生。这个平台被称为电子学习。e-Learning允许教师将许多问题保存到e-Learning题库中。然而,这些问题需要复习,这样这些问题才能与能力的成就相匹配。布鲁姆分类法是一个经常用来提高问题质量的教育鉴定标准。布鲁姆的分类法创建于1956年,并于2001年修订。本研究比较了支持向量机和Naïve贝叶斯算法在基于修订的Bloom分类法的认知水平对测验问题进行分类的性能。在本研究中,数据集在处理不平衡类时接受了两种处理。一个数据集使用SMOTE方法,另一个数据集不使用任何过采样方法。结果表明,使用过采样数据集的分类效果优于未使用过采样数据集的分类效果。使用SMOTE的支持向量机算法的准确率最高,达到98%,而使用SMOTE的Naïve Bayes算法的准确率为91%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信