PFS: Probabilistic filter scheduling against distributed denial-of-service attacks

Dongwon Seo, Heejo Lee, A. Perrig
{"title":"PFS: Probabilistic filter scheduling against distributed denial-of-service attacks","authors":"Dongwon Seo, Heejo Lee, A. Perrig","doi":"10.1109/LCN.2011.6114645","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Distributed denial-of-service (DDoS) attacks continue to pose an important challenge to current networks. DDoS attacks can cause victim resource consumption and link congestion. A filter-based DDoS defense is considered as an effective approach, since it can defend against both attacks: victim resource consumption and link congestion. However, existing filter-based approaches do not address necessary properties for viable DDoS solutions: how to practically identify attack paths, how to propagate filters to the best locations (filter routers), and how to manage many filters to maximize the defense effectiveness. We propose a novel mechanism, termed PFS (Probabilistic Filter Scheduling), to efficiently defeat DDoS attacks and to satisfy the necessary properties. In PFS, filter routers identify attack paths using probabilistic packet marking, and maintain filters using a scheduling policy to maximize the defense effectiveness. Our experiments show that PFS achieves 44% higher effectiveness than other filter-based approaches. Furthermore, we vary PFS parameters in terms of the marking probability and deployment ratio, and find that 30% marking probability and 30% deployment rate maximize the attack blocking rate of PFS.","PeriodicalId":437953,"journal":{"name":"2011 IEEE 36th Conference on Local Computer Networks","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"18","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2011 IEEE 36th Conference on Local Computer Networks","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/LCN.2011.6114645","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

Abstract

Distributed denial-of-service (DDoS) attacks continue to pose an important challenge to current networks. DDoS attacks can cause victim resource consumption and link congestion. A filter-based DDoS defense is considered as an effective approach, since it can defend against both attacks: victim resource consumption and link congestion. However, existing filter-based approaches do not address necessary properties for viable DDoS solutions: how to practically identify attack paths, how to propagate filters to the best locations (filter routers), and how to manage many filters to maximize the defense effectiveness. We propose a novel mechanism, termed PFS (Probabilistic Filter Scheduling), to efficiently defeat DDoS attacks and to satisfy the necessary properties. In PFS, filter routers identify attack paths using probabilistic packet marking, and maintain filters using a scheduling policy to maximize the defense effectiveness. Our experiments show that PFS achieves 44% higher effectiveness than other filter-based approaches. Furthermore, we vary PFS parameters in terms of the marking probability and deployment ratio, and find that 30% marking probability and 30% deployment rate maximize the attack blocking rate of PFS.
PFS:针对分布式拒绝服务攻击的概率过滤器调度
分布式拒绝服务(DDoS)攻击继续对当前网络构成重要挑战。DDoS攻击会导致受害者资源消耗和链路拥塞。基于过滤器的DDoS防御是一种有效的DDoS防御方法,因为它可以防御受害者资源消耗和链路拥塞两种攻击。然而,现有的基于过滤器的方法没有解决可行的DDoS解决方案的必要属性:如何实际识别攻击路径,如何将过滤器传播到最佳位置(过滤路由器),以及如何管理许多过滤器以最大限度地提高防御效率。我们提出了一种新的机制,称为PFS(概率过滤调度),以有效地挫败DDoS攻击并满足必要的属性。在PFS中,过滤器路由器使用概率包标记识别攻击路径,并使用调度策略维护过滤器,以最大限度地提高防御效果。我们的实验表明,PFS比其他基于滤波器的方法的效率高44%。此外,我们根据标记概率和部署率来改变PFS参数,发现30%的标记概率和30%的部署率使PFS的攻击拦截率最大化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书