The Effect of Feminist Identification on the Perceived Authenticity of Male Allies

Nathalia G. Lee, Priscilla Lok-chee Shum, Stephen C. Wright, McKenzie Bahrami
{"title":"The Effect of Feminist Identification on the Perceived Authenticity of Male Allies","authors":"Nathalia G. Lee, Priscilla Lok-chee Shum, Stephen C. Wright, McKenzie Bahrami","doi":"10.33921/uwbf7249","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Male allies are often described as essential to reducing gender inequity. However, some men may become allies through benevolent sexist beliefs. While some women recognize this as a suboptimal form of allyship, others may interpret it as authentic. We investigated whether the type of allyship (egalitarian vs. benevolent sexist) influences women’s perceptions of authenticity and whether women’s feminist identification moderates this effect. Women (N = 132) undergraduate students completed a pre-screening survey including a measure of feminist identification. They read about and rated the authenticity of a male ally who exhibited egalitarianism or benevolent sexism in his effort to increase women representation in a male-dominated club. Women perceived the egalitarian ally as highly authentic regardless of their feminist identification. However, higher feminist identification was associated with higher perceived authenticity for the benevolent sexist ally. Results are discussed in terms of how feminist identification can influence women’s perceptions of men who help.","PeriodicalId":419892,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Interpersonal Relations, Intergroup Relations and Identity","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Interpersonal Relations, Intergroup Relations and Identity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33921/uwbf7249","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Male allies are often described as essential to reducing gender inequity. However, some men may become allies through benevolent sexist beliefs. While some women recognize this as a suboptimal form of allyship, others may interpret it as authentic. We investigated whether the type of allyship (egalitarian vs. benevolent sexist) influences women’s perceptions of authenticity and whether women’s feminist identification moderates this effect. Women (N = 132) undergraduate students completed a pre-screening survey including a measure of feminist identification. They read about and rated the authenticity of a male ally who exhibited egalitarianism or benevolent sexism in his effort to increase women representation in a male-dominated club. Women perceived the egalitarian ally as highly authentic regardless of their feminist identification. However, higher feminist identification was associated with higher perceived authenticity for the benevolent sexist ally. Results are discussed in terms of how feminist identification can influence women’s perceptions of men who help.
女性认同对男性同盟者真实性感知的影响
男性盟友通常被认为对减少性别不平等至关重要。然而,一些男性可能会因为善意的性别歧视信仰而成为盟友。虽然有些女性认为这是一种次优的盟友关系,但其他人可能会认为这是真实的。我们调查了同盟关系的类型(平等主义vs.仁慈的性别歧视者)是否会影响女性对真实性的看法,以及女性的女权主义认同是否会调节这种影响。女大学生(N = 132)完成了一项包括女权主义认同的预筛选调查。他们阅读了一篇文章,并对一位男性盟友的真实性进行了打分,这位男性盟友在努力增加男性主导的俱乐部中的女性代表时,表现出了平等主义或善意的性别歧视。不管女性主义者的身份如何,女性都认为平等主义是高度真实的。然而,对于仁慈的性别歧视盟友来说,更高的女权主义认同与更高的感知真实性相关。研究结果讨论了女权主义认同如何影响女性对提供帮助的男性的看法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信