Capital punishment at the intersections of discrimination and disadvantage: the plight of foreign nationals

C. Hoyle
{"title":"Capital punishment at the intersections of discrimination and disadvantage: the plight of foreign nationals","authors":"C. Hoyle","doi":"10.4337/9781786433251.00019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Around the world, differential rates and experiences of victimization, criminalization and punishment can be largely accounted for by race, religion and citizenship.2 Death sentences and executions are extreme examples of the effects of disempowerment, disadvantage and discrimination on certain populations subject to the criminal process. While some groups recognized as vulnerable—such as juveniles, pregnant women or the intellectually disabled—are in most countries excluded from the ultimate penalty by categorical exemptions, characteristics such as race, religion and citizenship status are not protective and are sites of discrimination in the administration of the death penalty. Furthermore, these characteristics can interact with each other to create a sum of disadvantage greater than its parts. To date, most research on the death penalty has been conducted in the US and has focused on discrimination on grounds of race, although empirical research has also demonstrated the adverse impact of inadequate resources.3 Much less attention has been paid to factors such as religion, citizenship, gender and sexual orientation. Beyond the US, there is a paucity of empirical data on jurisdictions that make regular use of the death penalty, especially those that rely on migrant workers. This chapter will focus on under-researched countries in the Gulf and Asia, particularly Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates (UAE), Pakistan, Malaysia and Indonesia. In such jurisdictions, we learn little by focusing only on race. There, it will be argued, discrimination and arbitrariness in the administration of the death penalty would be better understood in relation to disadvantage at the intersections of ethnicity, religion and citizenship. In considering these under-researched sites of discrimination and disadvantage, this chapter adopts an intersectionality approach, turning the lens on foreign nationals who do not enjoy","PeriodicalId":348391,"journal":{"name":"Comparative Capital Punishment","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Comparative Capital Punishment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4337/9781786433251.00019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Around the world, differential rates and experiences of victimization, criminalization and punishment can be largely accounted for by race, religion and citizenship.2 Death sentences and executions are extreme examples of the effects of disempowerment, disadvantage and discrimination on certain populations subject to the criminal process. While some groups recognized as vulnerable—such as juveniles, pregnant women or the intellectually disabled—are in most countries excluded from the ultimate penalty by categorical exemptions, characteristics such as race, religion and citizenship status are not protective and are sites of discrimination in the administration of the death penalty. Furthermore, these characteristics can interact with each other to create a sum of disadvantage greater than its parts. To date, most research on the death penalty has been conducted in the US and has focused on discrimination on grounds of race, although empirical research has also demonstrated the adverse impact of inadequate resources.3 Much less attention has been paid to factors such as religion, citizenship, gender and sexual orientation. Beyond the US, there is a paucity of empirical data on jurisdictions that make regular use of the death penalty, especially those that rely on migrant workers. This chapter will focus on under-researched countries in the Gulf and Asia, particularly Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates (UAE), Pakistan, Malaysia and Indonesia. In such jurisdictions, we learn little by focusing only on race. There, it will be argued, discrimination and arbitrariness in the administration of the death penalty would be better understood in relation to disadvantage at the intersections of ethnicity, religion and citizenship. In considering these under-researched sites of discrimination and disadvantage, this chapter adopts an intersectionality approach, turning the lens on foreign nationals who do not enjoy
在歧视与不利的交叉点处的死刑:外国人的困境
在世界各地,受害、定罪和惩罚的不同比率和经历在很大程度上可以由种族、宗教和公民身份来解释死刑判决和处决是剥夺权力、不利地位和歧视对受刑事程序影响的某些人口产生影响的极端例子。虽然一些被认为是弱势群体的群体,如青少年、孕妇或智障人士,在大多数国家因绝对豁免而被排除在最终刑罚之外,但种族、宗教和公民身份等特征并不具有保护作用,而且在执行死刑时存在歧视。此外,这些特征可以相互作用,形成一个大于其部分的劣势总和。迄今为止,大多数关于死刑的研究都是在美国进行的,并且集中于基于种族的歧视,尽管实证研究也证明了资源不足的不利影响对宗教、公民身份、性别和性取向等因素的关注要少得多。在美国之外,关于经常使用死刑的司法管辖区,特别是那些依赖移民工人的司法管辖区,缺乏经验数据。本章将重点关注研究不足的海湾和亚洲国家,特别是沙特阿拉伯、阿拉伯联合酋长国、巴基斯坦、马来西亚和印度尼西亚。在这样的司法管辖区,只关注种族问题,我们学不到什么。有人会说,这样就可以更好地理解在种族、宗教和公民身份的交叉点上处于不利地位的人在执行死刑方面的歧视和任意性。在考虑这些未被充分研究的歧视和不利场所时,本章采用了交叉性方法,将镜头转向不享受的外国国民
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信