OCTOPOCS: Automatic Verification of Propagated Vulnerable Code Using Reformed Proofs of Concept

Seongkyeong Kwon, Seunghoon Woo, Gangmo Seong, Heejo Lee
{"title":"OCTOPOCS: Automatic Verification of Propagated Vulnerable Code Using Reformed Proofs of Concept","authors":"Seongkyeong Kwon, Seunghoon Woo, Gangmo Seong, Heejo Lee","doi":"10.1109/DSN48987.2021.00032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Addressing vulnerability propagation has become a major issue in software ecosystems. Existing approaches hold the promise of detecting widespread vulnerabilities but cannot be applied to verify effectively whether propagated vulnerable code still poses threats. We present OCTOPOCS, which uses a reformed Proof-of-Concept (PoC), to verify whether a vulnerability is propagated. Using context-aware taint analysis, OCTOPOCS extracts crash primitives (the parts used in the shared code area between the original vulnerable software and propagated software) from the original PoC. OCTOPOCS then utilizes directed symbolic execution to generate guiding inputs that direct the execution of the propagated software from the entry point to the shared code area. Thereafter, OCTOPOCS creates a new PoC by combining crash primitives and guiding inputs. It finally verifies the propagated vulnerability using the created PoC. We evaluated OCTOPOCS with 15 real-world C and C++ vulnerable software pairs, with results showing that OCTOPOCS successfully verified 14 propagated vulnerabilities.","PeriodicalId":222512,"journal":{"name":"2021 51st Annual IEEE/IFIP International Conference on Dependable Systems and Networks (DSN)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 51st Annual IEEE/IFIP International Conference on Dependable Systems and Networks (DSN)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/DSN48987.2021.00032","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Addressing vulnerability propagation has become a major issue in software ecosystems. Existing approaches hold the promise of detecting widespread vulnerabilities but cannot be applied to verify effectively whether propagated vulnerable code still poses threats. We present OCTOPOCS, which uses a reformed Proof-of-Concept (PoC), to verify whether a vulnerability is propagated. Using context-aware taint analysis, OCTOPOCS extracts crash primitives (the parts used in the shared code area between the original vulnerable software and propagated software) from the original PoC. OCTOPOCS then utilizes directed symbolic execution to generate guiding inputs that direct the execution of the propagated software from the entry point to the shared code area. Thereafter, OCTOPOCS creates a new PoC by combining crash primitives and guiding inputs. It finally verifies the propagated vulnerability using the created PoC. We evaluated OCTOPOCS with 15 real-world C and C++ vulnerable software pairs, with results showing that OCTOPOCS successfully verified 14 propagated vulnerabilities.
OCTOPOCS:使用改进的概念证明对传播的脆弱代码进行自动验证
解决漏洞传播问题已经成为软件生态系统中的一个主要问题。现有的方法有望检测到广泛存在的漏洞,但不能有效地验证传播的漏洞代码是否仍然构成威胁。我们提出了OCTOPOCS,它使用改进的概念验证(PoC)来验证漏洞是否传播。使用上下文感知污染分析,OCTOPOCS从原始PoC中提取崩溃原语(在原始易受攻击的软件和传播的软件之间的共享代码区域中使用的部分)。然后,OCTOPOCS利用定向符号执行来生成引导输入,指导从入口点到共享代码区域的传播软件的执行。此后,OCTOPOCS通过组合崩溃原语和引导输入创建一个新的PoC。它最后使用创建的PoC验证传播的漏洞。我们使用15对真实世界的C和c++漏洞软件对对OCTOPOCS进行了评估,结果显示,OCTOPOCS成功验证了14个传播漏洞。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信