Hemodynamic Classifications of Aortic Stenosis and Relevance to Prognosis

Susan H. Kwon, A. Gopal
{"title":"Hemodynamic Classifications of Aortic Stenosis and Relevance to Prognosis","authors":"Susan H. Kwon, A. Gopal","doi":"10.5772/intechopen.86707","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Hemodynamic classifications of aortic valve stenosis (AS) have important prognostic implications. In normal flow state, severe AS is defined as peak aortic velocity ≥ 4.0 m/s, mean transaortic gradient (MG) ≥ 40 mmHg, and aortic valve area (AVA) < 1.0 cm 2 . However, numerous studies have shown that severe AS (based on AVA < 1.0 cm 2 ) with low gradient (MG < 40 mmHg) is prevalent due to low flow state, in the setting of reduced and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Thus, the hemodynamic classifications of AS with AVA < 1.0 cm 2 were expanded to include the transvalvular flow state and pressure gradients. These flow-gradient patterns include normal flow/very high gradient, normal flow/high gradient, low flow/high gradient, low flow/low gradient with reduced LVEF, low flow/low gradient with preserved LVEF, and normal flow/low gradient. Among these, the low-gradient AS subgroups are challenging, particularly to differentiate true-severe AS (where aortic valve replacement is necessary) and pseudo-severe AS (where conservative management is recommended). Additional diagnostic studies such as dobutamine stress echocardiography and/or cardiac computed tomography, as well as other parameters such as projected AVA and/ or valvuloarterial impedance may be helpful. This chapter will review diagnostic approaches and prognostic implications of different AS subtypes.","PeriodicalId":403058,"journal":{"name":"Aortic Stenosis - Current Perspectives","volume":"47 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aortic Stenosis - Current Perspectives","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.86707","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Hemodynamic classifications of aortic valve stenosis (AS) have important prognostic implications. In normal flow state, severe AS is defined as peak aortic velocity ≥ 4.0 m/s, mean transaortic gradient (MG) ≥ 40 mmHg, and aortic valve area (AVA) < 1.0 cm 2 . However, numerous studies have shown that severe AS (based on AVA < 1.0 cm 2 ) with low gradient (MG < 40 mmHg) is prevalent due to low flow state, in the setting of reduced and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Thus, the hemodynamic classifications of AS with AVA < 1.0 cm 2 were expanded to include the transvalvular flow state and pressure gradients. These flow-gradient patterns include normal flow/very high gradient, normal flow/high gradient, low flow/high gradient, low flow/low gradient with reduced LVEF, low flow/low gradient with preserved LVEF, and normal flow/low gradient. Among these, the low-gradient AS subgroups are challenging, particularly to differentiate true-severe AS (where aortic valve replacement is necessary) and pseudo-severe AS (where conservative management is recommended). Additional diagnostic studies such as dobutamine stress echocardiography and/or cardiac computed tomography, as well as other parameters such as projected AVA and/ or valvuloarterial impedance may be helpful. This chapter will review diagnostic approaches and prognostic implications of different AS subtypes.
主动脉狭窄的血流动力学分类及其与预后的关系
主动脉瓣狭窄的血流动力学分类具有重要的预后意义。在正常血流状态下,重度AS定义为主动脉峰值流速≥4.0 m/s,平均跨主动脉梯度(MG)≥40 mmHg,主动脉瓣面积(AVA) < 1.0 cm 2。然而,大量研究表明,低梯度(MG < 40 mmHg)的严重AS(基于AVA < 1.0 cm 2)在降低和保留左心室射血分数(LVEF)的情况下,由于低血流状态而普遍存在。因此,AVA < 1.0 cm 2的AS的血流动力学分类被扩展到包括跨瓣血流状态和压力梯度。这些流动梯度模式包括正常流量/非常高的梯度、正常流量/高梯度、低流量/高梯度、低流量/低梯度降低LVEF、低流量/低梯度保持LVEF和正常流量/低梯度。其中,低梯度AS亚组具有挑战性,特别是区分真严重AS(需要主动脉瓣置换术)和伪严重AS(建议保守治疗)。额外的诊断研究,如多巴酚丁胺应激超声心动图和/或心脏计算机断层扫描,以及其他参数,如AVA投影和/或瓣膜动脉阻抗可能会有所帮助。本章将回顾不同AS亚型的诊断方法和预后意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信