Framing expertise: Greek media representations of experts during the COVID-19 pandemic

Alexandros Minotakis, Michalis Tastsoglou
{"title":"Framing expertise: Greek media representations of experts during the COVID-19 pandemic","authors":"Alexandros Minotakis, Michalis Tastsoglou","doi":"10.1386/ajms_00120_1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"During the 2020 lockdown, news outlets played an important role on the public perceptions on public health crisis. Through framing, news outlets shape a given reality, present possible interpretations, exclude certain persons and organizations while providing visibility to others. In that sense, media influence public perceptions of expertise. In the case of COVID-19, experts’ views were crucial in raising public awareness as well as promoting appropriate and effective ways with addressing the crisis. Present research considers as an expert any person or organization who was deemed capable by news outlets to consult the audience on how to protect themselves from COVID-19. This study focuses on major news outlets in the Greek media system and their framing of expertise from 1 February 2020 to 30 April 2020. This period begins with the emergence of COVID-19 as the dominant issue in news stories. The sample consists of 2389 news items from six websites and six television (TV) stations. The research aims to understand whether news outlets frame (or not) certain organizations and persons as experts. By employing quantitative content analysis, general tendencies in framing are analysed. The results infer that public officials were framed as the main category of experts. Greek news outlets in most cases avoided framing World Health Organization (WHO) representatives as experts, especially after the first death by COVID-19 in Greece (12 March 2020). In general, the reference period was proven to be a crucial factor as expertise frames were differentiated before and after the first death in Greece and the implementation of lockdown measures. Moreover, research also confirmed that during health crises journalists prefer the thematic frame.","PeriodicalId":125587,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Journalism & Media Studies","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Journalism & Media Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1386/ajms_00120_1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

During the 2020 lockdown, news outlets played an important role on the public perceptions on public health crisis. Through framing, news outlets shape a given reality, present possible interpretations, exclude certain persons and organizations while providing visibility to others. In that sense, media influence public perceptions of expertise. In the case of COVID-19, experts’ views were crucial in raising public awareness as well as promoting appropriate and effective ways with addressing the crisis. Present research considers as an expert any person or organization who was deemed capable by news outlets to consult the audience on how to protect themselves from COVID-19. This study focuses on major news outlets in the Greek media system and their framing of expertise from 1 February 2020 to 30 April 2020. This period begins with the emergence of COVID-19 as the dominant issue in news stories. The sample consists of 2389 news items from six websites and six television (TV) stations. The research aims to understand whether news outlets frame (or not) certain organizations and persons as experts. By employing quantitative content analysis, general tendencies in framing are analysed. The results infer that public officials were framed as the main category of experts. Greek news outlets in most cases avoided framing World Health Organization (WHO) representatives as experts, especially after the first death by COVID-19 in Greece (12 March 2020). In general, the reference period was proven to be a crucial factor as expertise frames were differentiated before and after the first death in Greece and the implementation of lockdown measures. Moreover, research also confirmed that during health crises journalists prefer the thematic frame.
框架专业知识:2019冠状病毒病大流行期间希腊媒体专家代表
在2020年封锁期间,新闻媒体在公众对公共卫生危机的认知方面发挥了重要作用。通过框架,新闻媒体塑造给定的现实,提出可能的解释,排除某些人和组织,同时为其他人提供能见度。从这个意义上说,媒体影响公众对专业知识的看法。就2019冠状病毒病而言,专家的意见对于提高公众意识以及促进应对危机的适当有效方法至关重要。目前的研究认为,任何被新闻媒体认为有能力向观众咨询如何保护自己免受COVID-19感染的个人或组织都是专家。本研究的重点是2020年2月1日至2020年4月30日期间希腊媒体系统中的主要新闻机构及其专业知识框架。这一时期始于2019冠状病毒病成为新闻报道中的主要问题。样本包括来自6个网站和6个电视台的2389条新闻。该研究的目的是了解新闻媒体是否将某些组织和个人视为专家。通过定量内容分析,分析了框架的一般趋势。结果表明,政府官员是专家的主要类别。在大多数情况下,希腊新闻媒体避免将世界卫生组织(世卫组织)代表描绘成专家,特别是在希腊出现首例COVID-19死亡病例(2020年3月12日)之后。总的来说,参照期被证明是一个关键因素,因为在希腊第一例死亡和实施封锁措施之前和之后,专门知识框架有所区别。此外,研究还证实,在卫生危机期间,记者更喜欢主题框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信