Sovereign Debt Restructuring: A Bankruptcy Reorganization Approach

S. Schwarcz
{"title":"Sovereign Debt Restructuring: A Bankruptcy Reorganization Approach","authors":"S. Schwarcz","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.203671","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article systematically examines sovereign debt restructuring in light of bankruptcy reorganization law principles. It proposes that a simple and arguably practical convention, based on just three of these principles, would encourage free market funding of troubled States, thereby avoiding reliance on the International Monetary Fund (and the moral hazard and taxpayer subsidy issues caused by such reliance). On the other hand, the article proposes a limited role for the IMF that would allow it to continue its current practice of imposing conditionality on funding, but without triggering any of the problems presently associated with IMF lending. Furthermore, the article explains why a convention is needed to solve the problem of holdout creditors undermining collective action toward a negotiated settlement. In this context, the article shows that recent proposals to contractually solve this problem by introducing special-majority voting clauses in new bond issues are doomed to failure. The article additionally explains why no international bankruptcy court or other new organization is needed.","PeriodicalId":275936,"journal":{"name":"Duke Law School Public Law & Legal Theory Research Paper Series","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"26","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Duke Law School Public Law & Legal Theory Research Paper Series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.203671","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 26

Abstract

This article systematically examines sovereign debt restructuring in light of bankruptcy reorganization law principles. It proposes that a simple and arguably practical convention, based on just three of these principles, would encourage free market funding of troubled States, thereby avoiding reliance on the International Monetary Fund (and the moral hazard and taxpayer subsidy issues caused by such reliance). On the other hand, the article proposes a limited role for the IMF that would allow it to continue its current practice of imposing conditionality on funding, but without triggering any of the problems presently associated with IMF lending. Furthermore, the article explains why a convention is needed to solve the problem of holdout creditors undermining collective action toward a negotiated settlement. In this context, the article shows that recent proposals to contractually solve this problem by introducing special-majority voting clauses in new bond issues are doomed to failure. The article additionally explains why no international bankruptcy court or other new organization is needed.
主权债务重组:一种破产重组方法
本文从破产重整的法律原则出发,系统地考察了主权债务重整。它建议,只要以其中三项原则为基础,订立一项简单而可行的公约,就可以鼓励向陷入困境的国家提供自由市场资金,从而避免依赖国际货币基金组织(以及这种依赖所造成的道德风险和纳税人补贴问题)。另一方面,该文章建议IMF发挥有限的作用,允许其继续目前对融资施加条件的做法,但不会引发目前与IMF贷款相关的任何问题。此外,这篇文章解释了为什么需要一项公约来解决顽固债权人破坏谈判解决集体行动的问题。在此背景下,本文认为,最近提出的通过在新发行债券中引入特殊多数表决条款以合同方式解决这一问题的建议注定要失败。文章还解释了为什么不需要国际破产法院或其他新的组织。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信