A Comparison of Architectures for Various Decision Diagram Machines

Hiroki Nakahara, Tsutomu Sasao, M. Matsuura
{"title":"A Comparison of Architectures for Various Decision Diagram Machines","authors":"Hiroki Nakahara, Tsutomu Sasao, M. Matsuura","doi":"10.1109/ISMVL.2010.50","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper compares 6 decision diagram machines (DDMs) with respect to area-time complexity, throughput, and compatibility to the existing memory. First, 6 types of decision diagrams (DDs): BDD, MDD, QRBDD, QRMDD, heterogeneous MDD (HMDD), and QRHMDD are introduced. Second, corresponding DDMs are developed. Third, memory sizes and average path length (APL) for these DDs are compared. As for area-time complexity, the QDDM is the best; as for throughput, the QRQDDM is the best; and as for compatibility to the existing memory, the HMDDM is the best.","PeriodicalId":447743,"journal":{"name":"2010 40th IEEE International Symposium on Multiple-Valued Logic","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2010 40th IEEE International Symposium on Multiple-Valued Logic","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISMVL.2010.50","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

Abstract

This paper compares 6 decision diagram machines (DDMs) with respect to area-time complexity, throughput, and compatibility to the existing memory. First, 6 types of decision diagrams (DDs): BDD, MDD, QRBDD, QRMDD, heterogeneous MDD (HMDD), and QRHMDD are introduced. Second, corresponding DDMs are developed. Third, memory sizes and average path length (APL) for these DDs are compared. As for area-time complexity, the QDDM is the best; as for throughput, the QRQDDM is the best; and as for compatibility to the existing memory, the HMDDM is the best.
各种决策图机的结构比较
本文比较了6种决策图机(ddm)在区域时间复杂度、吞吐量和对现有内存的兼容性方面的差异。首先,介绍了六种类型的决策图:BDD、MDD、QRBDD、QRMDD、异构MDD和QRHMDD。其次,制定相应的ddm。第三,比较了这些dd的内存大小和平均路径长度(APL)。在区域-时间复杂度方面,QDDM是最好的;在吞吐量方面,QRQDDM是最好的;在与现有存储器的兼容性方面,HMDDM是最好的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信