Promoting Workplace Innovation in an Innovation Policy Context

T. Alasoini
{"title":"Promoting Workplace Innovation in an Innovation Policy Context","authors":"T. Alasoini","doi":"10.46364/ejwi.v7i1.859","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The wider societal impact of workplace innovation development programmes has typically been limited by their poor ability to scale up project outcomes and disseminate good practice. Researchers have proposed different means to address the challenges of diffusion. One of the suggested means is to strengthen the integration of programmes to industrial or innovation policy frameworks, instead of an industrial relations framework. Using the “Finnish Liideri – Business, Productivity and Joy at Work” (2012–18) programme as an object of analysis, this article examines what added value the programme’s attachment to the innovation policy context brought compared to previous Finnish programmes and to what extent this attachment helped to bring new solutions to the challenges of diffusion. The analysis shows that the Liideri programme included many new features compared to previous Finnish programmes, opening up opportunities for more holistic development work in companies. However, based on the data available, it was not possible to give a clear answer to the question of the real added value of this integration to the development of companies or compared with the results of projects funded by previous Finnish workplace innovation development programmes. Concerning the question on dissemination of good practice, the article concludes that, despite its large-scale and high-quality activation work, the Liideri programme did not include sufficiently efficient and innovative measures that would have enabled it to meet better the challenges of diffusion. ","PeriodicalId":115904,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Workplace Innovation","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Workplace Innovation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46364/ejwi.v7i1.859","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The wider societal impact of workplace innovation development programmes has typically been limited by their poor ability to scale up project outcomes and disseminate good practice. Researchers have proposed different means to address the challenges of diffusion. One of the suggested means is to strengthen the integration of programmes to industrial or innovation policy frameworks, instead of an industrial relations framework. Using the “Finnish Liideri – Business, Productivity and Joy at Work” (2012–18) programme as an object of analysis, this article examines what added value the programme’s attachment to the innovation policy context brought compared to previous Finnish programmes and to what extent this attachment helped to bring new solutions to the challenges of diffusion. The analysis shows that the Liideri programme included many new features compared to previous Finnish programmes, opening up opportunities for more holistic development work in companies. However, based on the data available, it was not possible to give a clear answer to the question of the real added value of this integration to the development of companies or compared with the results of projects funded by previous Finnish workplace innovation development programmes. Concerning the question on dissemination of good practice, the article concludes that, despite its large-scale and high-quality activation work, the Liideri programme did not include sufficiently efficient and innovative measures that would have enabled it to meet better the challenges of diffusion. 
在创新政策背景下促进工作场所创新
工作场所创新发展计划的更广泛的社会影响通常受到限制,因为它们扩大项目成果和传播良好做法的能力较差。研究人员提出了不同的方法来应对传播的挑战。建议的方法之一是加强方案与工业或创新政策框架的结合,而不是与工业关系框架的结合。本文以“芬兰Liideri -商业、生产力和工作乐趣”(2012-18)项目为分析对象,研究了与之前的芬兰项目相比,该项目对创新政策背景的附加价值,以及这种附加价值在多大程度上有助于为传播挑战带来新的解决方案。分析显示,与之前的芬兰课程相比,利德利学院的课程包含了许多新特点,为企业开展更全面的开发工作提供了机会。但是,根据现有的数据,不可能明确回答这种一体化对公司发展的真正附加价值的问题,也不可能与以前芬兰工作场所创新发展方案资助的项目的结果进行比较。关于传播良好做法的问题,文章的结论是,尽管Liideri方案进行了大规模和高质量的激活工作,但它没有包括足够有效和创新的措施,使它能够更好地应付传播的挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信