T. Passerini, Jaroslaw Slawinski, U. Villa, V. Sunderam
{"title":"Experiences with Cost and Utility Trade-offs on IaaS Clouds, Grids, and On-Premise Resources","authors":"T. Passerini, Jaroslaw Slawinski, U. Villa, V. Sunderam","doi":"10.1109/IC2E.2014.51","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Cloud computing is now a mainstream technology in many application domains and user constituencies. For scientific high-performance applications in academic and research settings however, the trade-offs between cost and elasticity on the one hand, and performance and access on the other, is not always clear. We discuss our experiences with comparing cost and utility for a hemodynamics computational fluid dynamics code on three typical platform-types available to researchers: IaaS clouds, grids, and on-premise local resources. To rank the tested platforms, we introduce a simple utility function describing the value of a completed computational task to the user as a function of the wait time and the cost of the computation. Our results suggest that IaaS clouds can be a convenient choice for the considered class of CFD simulations, providing a valuable trade-off between cost and task completion time.","PeriodicalId":273902,"journal":{"name":"2014 IEEE International Conference on Cloud Engineering","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2014 IEEE International Conference on Cloud Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IC2E.2014.51","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6
Abstract
Cloud computing is now a mainstream technology in many application domains and user constituencies. For scientific high-performance applications in academic and research settings however, the trade-offs between cost and elasticity on the one hand, and performance and access on the other, is not always clear. We discuss our experiences with comparing cost and utility for a hemodynamics computational fluid dynamics code on three typical platform-types available to researchers: IaaS clouds, grids, and on-premise local resources. To rank the tested platforms, we introduce a simple utility function describing the value of a completed computational task to the user as a function of the wait time and the cost of the computation. Our results suggest that IaaS clouds can be a convenient choice for the considered class of CFD simulations, providing a valuable trade-off between cost and task completion time.