Experiences with Cost and Utility Trade-offs on IaaS Clouds, Grids, and On-Premise Resources

T. Passerini, Jaroslaw Slawinski, U. Villa, V. Sunderam
{"title":"Experiences with Cost and Utility Trade-offs on IaaS Clouds, Grids, and On-Premise Resources","authors":"T. Passerini, Jaroslaw Slawinski, U. Villa, V. Sunderam","doi":"10.1109/IC2E.2014.51","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Cloud computing is now a mainstream technology in many application domains and user constituencies. For scientific high-performance applications in academic and research settings however, the trade-offs between cost and elasticity on the one hand, and performance and access on the other, is not always clear. We discuss our experiences with comparing cost and utility for a hemodynamics computational fluid dynamics code on three typical platform-types available to researchers: IaaS clouds, grids, and on-premise local resources. To rank the tested platforms, we introduce a simple utility function describing the value of a completed computational task to the user as a function of the wait time and the cost of the computation. Our results suggest that IaaS clouds can be a convenient choice for the considered class of CFD simulations, providing a valuable trade-off between cost and task completion time.","PeriodicalId":273902,"journal":{"name":"2014 IEEE International Conference on Cloud Engineering","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2014 IEEE International Conference on Cloud Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IC2E.2014.51","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Cloud computing is now a mainstream technology in many application domains and user constituencies. For scientific high-performance applications in academic and research settings however, the trade-offs between cost and elasticity on the one hand, and performance and access on the other, is not always clear. We discuss our experiences with comparing cost and utility for a hemodynamics computational fluid dynamics code on three typical platform-types available to researchers: IaaS clouds, grids, and on-premise local resources. To rank the tested platforms, we introduce a simple utility function describing the value of a completed computational task to the user as a function of the wait time and the cost of the computation. Our results suggest that IaaS clouds can be a convenient choice for the considered class of CFD simulations, providing a valuable trade-off between cost and task completion time.
在IaaS云、网格和内部部署资源上的成本和效用权衡经验
云计算现在是许多应用领域和用户群体的主流技术。然而,对于学术和研究环境中的科学高性能应用,一方面是成本和弹性,另一方面是性能和访问之间的权衡,并不总是很清楚。我们讨论了在研究人员可用的三种典型平台类型上比较血流动力学计算流体动力学代码的成本和效用的经验:IaaS云、网格和本地资源。为了对测试平台进行排名,我们引入了一个简单的效用函数,该函数将完成的计算任务对用户的价值描述为等待时间和计算成本的函数。我们的研究结果表明,IaaS云可以成为考虑的CFD模拟类别的方便选择,在成本和任务完成时间之间提供了有价值的权衡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信