Культурно-антропологическое измерение современного уголовного права

O. V. Kozachenko, Olha Mykhailivna Musychenko
{"title":"Культурно-антропологическое измерение современного уголовного права","authors":"O. V. Kozachenko, Olha Mykhailivna Musychenko","doi":"10.21564/2311-9640.2022.18.267252","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The spread of cultural-anthropological methodology to the problems of modern criminal law enabled to formulate a new doctrinal definition of criminal law as a culturally agreed system of social freedoms focused on protecting social, material and spiritual values that are the human culture achievements and belong to a person. The proposed cultural-anthropological dimension allowed us to substantiate the  appropriateness of recognition anthropodicy as a paradigm of modern criminal law. \nThe idea of periodization of  criminal law genesis was further developed with the identification of three qualitatively different periods of premodern, modern and postmodern, each of which is distinguished by a special role  played in culture in general and criminal law in particular. \nThe article provides  different understanding of social justice as the purpose of applying criminal law which is more complicated in the context of the rule of law dominance than in the traditional understanding of the compliance between crime and punishment. \nThe proposed approach allows to obtain a new type of criminal law, in which a person, regardless of the nature of participation in criminal relations, is provided with a number of rights and legal opportunities to protect their own, or those represented by it, interests. Іn addition, it creates grounds for further study of less global, but no less relevant problems of criminal law, in particular, ensuring objective criminalization, the formation of a coherent system of criminal law measures as a legal consequence of a socially dangerous act, the ratio of measures to physical and legal persons, etc.","PeriodicalId":387320,"journal":{"name":"Herald of the Association of Criminal Law of Ukraine","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Herald of the Association of Criminal Law of Ukraine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21564/2311-9640.2022.18.267252","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The spread of cultural-anthropological methodology to the problems of modern criminal law enabled to formulate a new doctrinal definition of criminal law as a culturally agreed system of social freedoms focused on protecting social, material and spiritual values that are the human culture achievements and belong to a person. The proposed cultural-anthropological dimension allowed us to substantiate the  appropriateness of recognition anthropodicy as a paradigm of modern criminal law. The idea of periodization of  criminal law genesis was further developed with the identification of three qualitatively different periods of premodern, modern and postmodern, each of which is distinguished by a special role  played in culture in general and criminal law in particular. The article provides  different understanding of social justice as the purpose of applying criminal law which is more complicated in the context of the rule of law dominance than in the traditional understanding of the compliance between crime and punishment. The proposed approach allows to obtain a new type of criminal law, in which a person, regardless of the nature of participation in criminal relations, is provided with a number of rights and legal opportunities to protect their own, or those represented by it, interests. Іn addition, it creates grounds for further study of less global, but no less relevant problems of criminal law, in particular, ensuring objective criminalization, the formation of a coherent system of criminal law measures as a legal consequence of a socially dangerous act, the ratio of measures to physical and legal persons, etc.
文化人类学方法在现代刑法问题上的传播,使刑法能够形成一种新的理论定义,将其定义为一种文化上商定的社会自由制度,其重点是保护作为人类文化成就并属于个人的社会、物质和精神价值。提出的文化人类学维度使我们能够证实将人类学作为现代刑法范式的适当性。刑法起源分期的思想进一步发展,确定了三个性质不同的时期:前现代、现代和后现代,每个时期都以其在一般文化,特别是刑法中所扮演的特殊角色而著称。本文提出了对社会正义作为刑法适用目的的不同理解,这种理解在法治主导的背景下比传统的罪罚合规性理解更为复杂。拟议的办法允许获得一种新型的刑法,在这种刑法中,一个人,无论参与犯罪关系的性质如何,都享有若干权利和法律机会来保护自己或其所代表的人的利益。Іn此外,它还为进一步研究不那么全球性但同样相关的刑法问题创造了基础,特别是确保客观定罪、形成作为社会危险行为的法律后果的连贯的刑法措施系统、措施对自然人和法人的比例等问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信