Aris C. Alexoulis-Chrysovergis, A. Weightman, E. Hodson-Tole, F. Deconinck
{"title":"Error Augmented Robotic Rehabilitation of the Upper Limb - A Review","authors":"Aris C. Alexoulis-Chrysovergis, A. Weightman, E. Hodson-Tole, F. Deconinck","doi":"10.5220/0004654101670178","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To collect and assess the available evidence for the efficacy of error augmentation in upper limb robotic rehabilitation. Methods: A systematic literature search up to May 2013 was conducted in one citation index, the Web of Knowledge, and in two individual databases: PubMed and Scopus, for publications that utilized error augmented feedback as practice modality in robotic rehabilitation of the upper limb. Results: The systematic search returned 12 studies that utilized error augmented feedback in trials to unimpaired and impaired individuals suffering from stroke, multiple sclerosis and primary dystonia. One additional study utilizing viscous force fields was included as the authors paid special merit to the effects of the field in directions where the error was amplified. In the studies that met the inclusion criteria two different types of error augmented feedback was used that is, haptic and visual feedback which were used either separately as rehabilitation modalities or in conjunction with each other. All studies but one report positive outcome regardless of the type(s) of feedback utilized. Conclusions: Error augmentation in upper limb robotic rehabilitation is a relatively new area of study, counting almost nine years after the first relevant publication and rather understudied. Error augmentation in upper limb robotic rehabilitation should be further researched in more practice-intensive studies and with larger trial groups. The potential of error augmented upper limb rehabilitation should also be explored with conditions other than the ones described in this review.","PeriodicalId":167011,"journal":{"name":"International Congress on Neurotechnology, Electronics and Informatics","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Congress on Neurotechnology, Electronics and Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5220/0004654101670178","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7
Abstract
Objective: To collect and assess the available evidence for the efficacy of error augmentation in upper limb robotic rehabilitation. Methods: A systematic literature search up to May 2013 was conducted in one citation index, the Web of Knowledge, and in two individual databases: PubMed and Scopus, for publications that utilized error augmented feedback as practice modality in robotic rehabilitation of the upper limb. Results: The systematic search returned 12 studies that utilized error augmented feedback in trials to unimpaired and impaired individuals suffering from stroke, multiple sclerosis and primary dystonia. One additional study utilizing viscous force fields was included as the authors paid special merit to the effects of the field in directions where the error was amplified. In the studies that met the inclusion criteria two different types of error augmented feedback was used that is, haptic and visual feedback which were used either separately as rehabilitation modalities or in conjunction with each other. All studies but one report positive outcome regardless of the type(s) of feedback utilized. Conclusions: Error augmentation in upper limb robotic rehabilitation is a relatively new area of study, counting almost nine years after the first relevant publication and rather understudied. Error augmentation in upper limb robotic rehabilitation should be further researched in more practice-intensive studies and with larger trial groups. The potential of error augmented upper limb rehabilitation should also be explored with conditions other than the ones described in this review.
目的:收集并评价误差增强在上肢机器人康复中的有效性。方法:系统检索截至2013年5月的文献,检索引文索引Web of Knowledge和两个独立数据库PubMed和Scopus,检索利用误差增强反馈作为上肢机器人康复实践模式的出版物。结果:系统检索返回了12项研究,这些研究在未受损和受损的中风、多发性硬化症和原发性肌张力障碍患者的试验中使用了误差增强反馈。另一项利用粘性力场的研究被包括在内,因为作者特别重视电场在误差放大方向上的影响。在符合纳入标准的研究中,使用了两种不同类型的误差增强反馈,即触觉和视觉反馈,它们要么单独用作康复模式,要么相互结合使用。除了一项研究外,所有研究都报告了积极的结果,而不管所使用的反馈类型如何。结论:上肢机器人康复中的误差增强是一个相对较新的研究领域,自首次相关发表以来已有近9年的时间,研究还很不足。误差增强在上肢机器人康复中的应用需要更多的实践强化研究和更大的试验群体。错误增强上肢康复的可能性也应与本综述所述的条件以外的条件进行探讨。