Natural Landscapes, Natural Communities, and Natural Ecosystems

K. Shrader-Frechette, E. McCoy
{"title":"Natural Landscapes, Natural Communities, and Natural Ecosystems","authors":"K. Shrader-Frechette, E. McCoy","doi":"10.2307/3983518","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Human Intervention, Disturbance, and Defining \"Natural\" More than a century ago, Ralph Waldo Emerson, in his essay on \"The Uses of Natural History,\" argued that \"[right action] is conformity to the laws of nature.\"! Many ecologists, environmentalists, and policymakers since then have urged conformity to these \"laws of nature.\" They have defined \"natural ecosystems,\" as opposed to \"artificial ecosystems,\" and established biocentric principles for how humans should treat these \"natural ecosystems.\"? Indeed, natural history and much of ecology presuppose some concept of natural place.' Likewise biogeography presupposes that the earth has \"natural divisions,\" and island biogeography, the developmental basis for landscape ecology, arose from a series of \"natural experiments.?' Because direct experimental manipulation of all relevant variables is rarely possible, landscape or regional ecology continues to progress by relying on quasi-experiments in the \"natural laboratories\" of various regions.' An important goal of many discussions about \"natural history,\" \"natural ecosystems,\" \"natural places,\" \"natural divisions,\" \"natural experiments,\" and \"natural laboratories\" is not only to learn more about these \"natural\" phenomena but also, as one ecologist put it, to \"protect natural systems.\"! A fundamental argument is that people ought to \"respect nature\" because the structures and functions of the natural world themselves have provided a guide for conservation and preservation decisions.' Indeed, if ecology and environmental policy-making are to avoid being arbitrary, terms such as \"ecosystem\" and \"community\" do not name mere concepts or human constructs but instead describe real characteristics of the natural world. The goal of protecting natural ecosystems or communities, however, often fails to provide direction for environmental policy because ecologists cannot always specifyeither what is \"natural\" or when human actions are in accord with nature.","PeriodicalId":425736,"journal":{"name":"Forest and Conservation History","volume":"39 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"24","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forest and Conservation History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/3983518","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 24

Abstract

Human Intervention, Disturbance, and Defining "Natural" More than a century ago, Ralph Waldo Emerson, in his essay on "The Uses of Natural History," argued that "[right action] is conformity to the laws of nature."! Many ecologists, environmentalists, and policymakers since then have urged conformity to these "laws of nature." They have defined "natural ecosystems," as opposed to "artificial ecosystems," and established biocentric principles for how humans should treat these "natural ecosystems."? Indeed, natural history and much of ecology presuppose some concept of natural place.' Likewise biogeography presupposes that the earth has "natural divisions," and island biogeography, the developmental basis for landscape ecology, arose from a series of "natural experiments.?' Because direct experimental manipulation of all relevant variables is rarely possible, landscape or regional ecology continues to progress by relying on quasi-experiments in the "natural laboratories" of various regions.' An important goal of many discussions about "natural history," "natural ecosystems," "natural places," "natural divisions," "natural experiments," and "natural laboratories" is not only to learn more about these "natural" phenomena but also, as one ecologist put it, to "protect natural systems."! A fundamental argument is that people ought to "respect nature" because the structures and functions of the natural world themselves have provided a guide for conservation and preservation decisions.' Indeed, if ecology and environmental policy-making are to avoid being arbitrary, terms such as "ecosystem" and "community" do not name mere concepts or human constructs but instead describe real characteristics of the natural world. The goal of protecting natural ecosystems or communities, however, often fails to provide direction for environmental policy because ecologists cannot always specifyeither what is "natural" or when human actions are in accord with nature.
自然景观、自然群落和自然生态系统
一个多世纪以前,拉尔夫·沃尔多·爱默生(Ralph Waldo Emerson)在他的论文《自然史的用途》(The Uses of Natural History)中指出:“(正确的行为)是符合自然规律的。”从那时起,许多生态学家、环保主义者和政策制定者都敦促人们遵守这些“自然法则”。他们定义了“自然生态系统”,而不是“人工生态系统”,并为人类应该如何对待这些“自然生态系统”建立了以生物为中心的原则。事实上,自然史和许多生态学都以自然地点的概念为前提。”同样,生物地理学假定地球有“自然分区”,而作为景观生态学发展基础的岛屿生物地理学,是从一系列“自然实验”中产生的。由于几乎不可能对所有相关变量进行直接实验操作,景观或区域生态学依靠在各个地区的“自然实验室”中的准实验继续取得进展。许多关于“自然历史”、“自然生态系统”、“自然地点”、“自然区划”、“自然实验”和“自然实验室”的讨论的一个重要目标是,不仅要更多地了解这些“自然”现象,而且要像一位生态学家所说的那样,“保护自然系统”。一个基本的论点是,人们应该“尊重自然”,因为自然世界本身的结构和功能为保护和保护决定提供了指导。事实上,如果生态学和环境政策的制定要避免武断,“生态系统”和“社区”这样的术语就不是单纯的概念或人类的构想,而是描述了自然世界的真实特征。然而,保护自然生态系统或社区的目标往往不能为环境政策提供方向,因为生态学家不能总是具体说明什么是“自然的”,或者什么时候人类的行为符合自然。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信