AIS 3+ Thoracic Injuries Among Drivers in Real-World Motor Vehicle Frontal Crashes: The Effect of Impact Direction, Impact Location and Status of Seat Belt

Peiyu Li, Chunsheng Ma, Yuzhe Dong, Hao Li, Jinhuan Zhang
{"title":"AIS 3+ Thoracic Injuries Among Drivers in Real-World Motor Vehicle Frontal Crashes: The Effect of Impact Direction, Impact Location and Status of Seat Belt","authors":"Peiyu Li, Chunsheng Ma, Yuzhe Dong, Hao Li, Jinhuan Zhang","doi":"10.1109/ICMTMA.2016.26","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper, comparing seat belt usage, investigates the combined effects of specific impact directions and impact locations on the serious-to-maximum thoracic injuries of drivers in frontal impact based on the 1995-2010 data from the United States Department of Transportation (US DOT) National Automotive Sampling System-Crashworthiness Data System (NASS-CDS). The selected sample is classified by three impact locations (distributed, offset and corner) and two impact directions (pure frontal and oblique), resulting in a total of six crash configurations. The risks of thoracic injury and its anatomic structure injury for drivers, considering using seat belt or not independently, in different frontal crash configurations are evaluated. The relative risks are computed also. Overall, results of the analyses reveal that the effectiveness of thorax protection by the seat belt is significant. But for thoracic organ injuries, in frontal corner impact, using seat belt may not decrease the risk of serious-to-maximum injuries significantly, as in frontal distributed impact for skeletal injuries.","PeriodicalId":318523,"journal":{"name":"2016 Eighth International Conference on Measuring Technology and Mechatronics Automation (ICMTMA)","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 Eighth International Conference on Measuring Technology and Mechatronics Automation (ICMTMA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICMTMA.2016.26","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This paper, comparing seat belt usage, investigates the combined effects of specific impact directions and impact locations on the serious-to-maximum thoracic injuries of drivers in frontal impact based on the 1995-2010 data from the United States Department of Transportation (US DOT) National Automotive Sampling System-Crashworthiness Data System (NASS-CDS). The selected sample is classified by three impact locations (distributed, offset and corner) and two impact directions (pure frontal and oblique), resulting in a total of six crash configurations. The risks of thoracic injury and its anatomic structure injury for drivers, considering using seat belt or not independently, in different frontal crash configurations are evaluated. The relative risks are computed also. Overall, results of the analyses reveal that the effectiveness of thorax protection by the seat belt is significant. But for thoracic organ injuries, in frontal corner impact, using seat belt may not decrease the risk of serious-to-maximum injuries significantly, as in frontal distributed impact for skeletal injuries.
现实世界机动车正面碰撞中驾驶员的AIS 3+胸部损伤:碰撞方向、碰撞位置和安全带状态的影响
本文以1995-2010年美国交通部(US DOT)国家汽车抽样系统-耐撞性数据系统(NASS-CDS)的数据为基础,比较安全带的使用情况,研究了特定碰撞方向和碰撞位置对正面碰撞中驾驶员严重至最大胸部损伤的综合影响。选取的样本按3个碰撞位置(分布、偏移和转角)和2个碰撞方向(纯正面和斜向)进行分类,共得到6种碰撞构型。在不同的正面碰撞配置下,分别评估了系安全带和不系安全带对驾驶员胸部及其解剖结构损伤的风险。还计算了相关风险。综上所述,分析结果表明,安全带对胸部的保护效果显著。但对于胸部器官损伤,在正面角碰撞中,使用安全带可能不会显著降低严重到最大伤害的风险,而在骨骼损伤的正面分布碰撞中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信