Raised Imperishable

Kaylie Page
{"title":"Raised Imperishable","authors":"Kaylie Page","doi":"10.6017/lv.v9i2.11131","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Christians live in light of eternity: we anticipate a future glory yet to be unveiled, but we also have some level of participation in that glory in the present. What shape should that anticipation and participation take? In other words, how does the resurrection influence ethical choices in the present? This paper draws on the work of historical and modern theologians to consider what effects the resurrection of the body has on Christian life in the present. It argues that the nature of embodied life in the resurrection affects our view of and our behavior towards our own bodies, the body of the church, and the bodies of other people in the world. While the paper sketches the outlines of an ethic based on the bodily resurrection in each of these areas, its main concern is with the spiritual attitude that informs and results from these ethical choices. As Dietrich Bonhoeffer observes, Christian ethics that focuses on the resurrection tends to fall into one of the two traps of otherworldliness or secularism. However, when attention is given to the spiritual effects of a resurrection-oriented ethic, both of these pitfalls can be avoided. Living in light of the resurrection sharpens our anticipation of heavenly glory, but it also proves our inability to attain that glory by our own power, forcing us to rely ever more on God as the source of our salvation. Thus, although living with reference to the resurrection of the body has positive influence on our ethical choices, the primary impact of such a life is to drive the Christian back to the Gospel.","PeriodicalId":109688,"journal":{"name":"Lumen et Vita","volume":"59 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lumen et Vita","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6017/lv.v9i2.11131","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Christians live in light of eternity: we anticipate a future glory yet to be unveiled, but we also have some level of participation in that glory in the present. What shape should that anticipation and participation take? In other words, how does the resurrection influence ethical choices in the present? This paper draws on the work of historical and modern theologians to consider what effects the resurrection of the body has on Christian life in the present. It argues that the nature of embodied life in the resurrection affects our view of and our behavior towards our own bodies, the body of the church, and the bodies of other people in the world. While the paper sketches the outlines of an ethic based on the bodily resurrection in each of these areas, its main concern is with the spiritual attitude that informs and results from these ethical choices. As Dietrich Bonhoeffer observes, Christian ethics that focuses on the resurrection tends to fall into one of the two traps of otherworldliness or secularism. However, when attention is given to the spiritual effects of a resurrection-oriented ethic, both of these pitfalls can be avoided. Living in light of the resurrection sharpens our anticipation of heavenly glory, but it also proves our inability to attain that glory by our own power, forcing us to rely ever more on God as the source of our salvation. Thus, although living with reference to the resurrection of the body has positive influence on our ethical choices, the primary impact of such a life is to drive the Christian back to the Gospel.
提出了不灭的
基督徒生活在永恒的光中:我们期待未来的荣耀尚未显露,但我们也在某种程度上参与到现在的荣耀中。这种期待和参与应该采取什么形式?换句话说,复活如何影响当下的伦理选择?这篇论文借鉴了历史和现代神学家的工作,来思考身体的复活对现在基督徒生活的影响。它认为,在复活中体现的生命的本质影响了我们对自己的身体、教会的身体和世界上其他人的身体的看法和行为。虽然这篇论文在这些领域中勾勒出了一种基于身体复活的伦理的轮廓,但它主要关注的是这些伦理选择所传达和产生的精神态度。正如迪特里希·邦霍费尔(Dietrich Bonhoeffer)所观察到的那样,关注复活的基督教伦理往往会陷入超凡脱俗或世俗主义的两个陷阱之一。然而,当我们注意到以复活为导向的伦理的属灵效果时,这两个陷阱都是可以避免的。活在复活的光中,使我们对天上的荣耀有更敏锐的期待,但也证明了我们无法靠自己的力量获得荣耀,迫使我们更加依赖神作为我们救恩的源头。因此,虽然身体复活的生活对我们的道德选择有积极的影响,但这种生活的主要影响是驱使基督徒回到福音。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信