Calculation of Frequency-Dependent Parameters of Pipe-Type Cables: Comparison of Methods

D. da Silva, G. Fernández, R. A. Rivas
{"title":"Calculation of Frequency-Dependent Parameters of Pipe-Type Cables: Comparison of Methods","authors":"D. da Silva, G. Fernández, R. A. Rivas","doi":"10.1109/TDCLA.2006.311519","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper the results of four analytical methods for the calculation of frequency-dependent parameters of pipe-type cables are compared. Method 1 is Ametani's method, which neglects proximity effects among conductors and assumes that the pipe has infinite thickness. Method 2 is a proposed method that takes proximity effects into account and assumes that the pipe has infinite thickness. Method 3 is also a proposed method, but neglects proximity effects among conductors and assumes that the pipe has finite thickness. Method 4 is Kane's method, which takes proximity effects into consideration and assumes that the pipe has finite thickness. With respect to Kane's method, the results obtained from the three first methods yield relative errors as high as 95 %, particularly at low frequencies","PeriodicalId":406067,"journal":{"name":"2006 IEEE/PES Transmission & Distribution Conference and Exposition: Latin America","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2006 IEEE/PES Transmission & Distribution Conference and Exposition: Latin America","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/TDCLA.2006.311519","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

In this paper the results of four analytical methods for the calculation of frequency-dependent parameters of pipe-type cables are compared. Method 1 is Ametani's method, which neglects proximity effects among conductors and assumes that the pipe has infinite thickness. Method 2 is a proposed method that takes proximity effects into account and assumes that the pipe has infinite thickness. Method 3 is also a proposed method, but neglects proximity effects among conductors and assumes that the pipe has finite thickness. Method 4 is Kane's method, which takes proximity effects into consideration and assumes that the pipe has finite thickness. With respect to Kane's method, the results obtained from the three first methods yield relative errors as high as 95 %, particularly at low frequencies
管式电缆频率相关参数的计算方法比较
本文比较了计算管式电缆频率相关参数的四种解析方法的结果。方法1是Ametani的方法,它忽略了导体之间的邻近效应,并假设管道的厚度是无限的。方法2是一种考虑邻近效应并假设管道具有无限厚度的方法。方法3也是一种提出的方法,但忽略了导体之间的邻近效应,并假设管道的厚度是有限的。方法4是Kane的方法,该方法考虑了邻近效应,并假设管道的厚度有限。对于凯恩的方法,前三种方法得到的结果产生的相对误差高达95%,特别是在低频
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信