FEATURES OF THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PRINCIPLE OF JUSTICE IN THE EXECUTION OF COURT DECISIONS

N. Shelever
{"title":"FEATURES OF THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PRINCIPLE OF JUSTICE IN THE EXECUTION OF COURT DECISIONS","authors":"N. Shelever","doi":"10.15421/392193","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A fair court decision is the goal of justice. The meaning of justice is achieved only when the court decision is executed. Otherwise, the court decision remains only a sheet of paper. Execution of court decisions is the final stage of the court process, which has as its purpose the implementation of the court decision. That is, in the execution of a court decision, the principle of justice is implemented in practice. The state executive service is responsible for enforcing court decisions. In accordance with the Constitution of Ukraine, the state must ensure the execution of a court decision. In addition to the adoption of an act of justice, courts must exercise appropriate judicial control over its execution. The author also draws attention to the fact that in practice there is often a “formal” execution, as enforcement proceedings are closed for one reason or another, and there is no actual execution of the court decision. The European Court of Human Rights singles out another problematic issue in Ukraine – the long-term non-enforcement of national court decisions. After analyzing the work of the state executive service, the author came to the conclusion that the situation is quite complicated. Compared to European countries, the performance rate is low. Due to the legal nihilism of the citizens of Ukraine, it is quite difficult to enforce court decisions in our country. Since the execution of court decisions is a component of the right to a fair trial, the author summarizes the experience, proposals of state executors and analyzes the relevant problems. Among them there are such as low wages of employees of the state executive service, the lack of proper security for state executors in the execution of court decisions, the need to increase the staff in the state executive service. Proposes to expand the rights of state executors and take active measures to combat corruption in the courts. Inadequate cooperation of banks, police and other bodies with the state executive service is also a big problem in practice, which significantly complicates the work of state executors and slows down the execution of court decisions. Therefore, the author summarizes the proposals of state performers and sets them out in the proposed article. In connection with Ukraine’s desire to become a full member of the European Union, the need to study the experience of leading member states in order to implement it in domestic legislation is emphasized.","PeriodicalId":228288,"journal":{"name":"Actual problems of native jurisprudence","volume":"37 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Actual problems of native jurisprudence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15421/392193","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A fair court decision is the goal of justice. The meaning of justice is achieved only when the court decision is executed. Otherwise, the court decision remains only a sheet of paper. Execution of court decisions is the final stage of the court process, which has as its purpose the implementation of the court decision. That is, in the execution of a court decision, the principle of justice is implemented in practice. The state executive service is responsible for enforcing court decisions. In accordance with the Constitution of Ukraine, the state must ensure the execution of a court decision. In addition to the adoption of an act of justice, courts must exercise appropriate judicial control over its execution. The author also draws attention to the fact that in practice there is often a “formal” execution, as enforcement proceedings are closed for one reason or another, and there is no actual execution of the court decision. The European Court of Human Rights singles out another problematic issue in Ukraine – the long-term non-enforcement of national court decisions. After analyzing the work of the state executive service, the author came to the conclusion that the situation is quite complicated. Compared to European countries, the performance rate is low. Due to the legal nihilism of the citizens of Ukraine, it is quite difficult to enforce court decisions in our country. Since the execution of court decisions is a component of the right to a fair trial, the author summarizes the experience, proposals of state executors and analyzes the relevant problems. Among them there are such as low wages of employees of the state executive service, the lack of proper security for state executors in the execution of court decisions, the need to increase the staff in the state executive service. Proposes to expand the rights of state executors and take active measures to combat corruption in the courts. Inadequate cooperation of banks, police and other bodies with the state executive service is also a big problem in practice, which significantly complicates the work of state executors and slows down the execution of court decisions. Therefore, the author summarizes the proposals of state performers and sets them out in the proposed article. In connection with Ukraine’s desire to become a full member of the European Union, the need to study the experience of leading member states in order to implement it in domestic legislation is emphasized.
司法公正原则在法院判决执行中的实施特点
公正的法庭判决是正义的目标。只有当法院的判决被执行时,正义的意义才得以实现。否则,法院的判决就只是一张纸。法院判决的执行是法院程序的最后阶段,其目的是执行法院判决。也就是说,在法院判决的执行中,正义原则在实践中得到了贯彻。国家行政部门负责执行法院的判决。根据乌克兰宪法,国家必须保证法院判决的执行。除了通过司法行为外,法院还必须对其执行行使适当的司法控制。发件人还提请注意这样一个事实,即在实践中往往有“正式”执行,因为执行程序由于这样或那样的原因而结束,而且没有实际执行法院的判决。欧洲人权法院指出了乌克兰的另一个问题- -长期不执行国家法院的裁决。通过对国家行政机关工作的分析,笔者认为情况是相当复杂的。与欧洲国家相比,绩效率较低。由于乌克兰公民的法律虚无主义,在我国执行法院判决相当困难。由于法院判决的执行是公正审判权的组成部分,笔者总结了国家执行人的经验和建议,并对相关问题进行了分析。其中包括国家行政人员的工资低,国家行政人员在执行法院判决时缺乏适当的保障,需要增加国家行政人员。建议扩大国家执行人的权利,采取积极措施打击法院腐败。银行、警察和其他机构与国家执行机构的合作不足也是实践中的一个大问题,这大大复杂化了国家执行机构的工作,减慢了法院判决的执行速度。因此,笔者总结了国家演员的建议,并在建议文章中加以阐述。关于乌克兰希望成为欧洲联盟正式成员的愿望,强调有必要研究主要成员国的经验,以便在国内立法中加以实施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信