THE LITERARY FUNCTION OF “JEREMIAH’S PRAYER”: A ROUGH WORKPIECE OR AN EPIGRAPH TO SHEVCHENKO’S MANUSCRIPT COLLECTION OF POEMS “THREE YEARS”?

Roksana Kharchuk
{"title":"THE LITERARY FUNCTION OF “JEREMIAH’S PRAYER”: A ROUGH WORKPIECE OR AN EPIGRAPH TO SHEVCHENKO’S MANUSCRIPT COLLECTION OF POEMS “THREE YEARS”?","authors":"Roksana Kharchuk","doi":"10.33608/0236-1477.2022.03.03-15","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper clarifies the literary function of Shevchenko’s “Jeremiah’s prayer”. At the same time, it raises the question of the poet’s identification and self-identification with Prophet Jeremiah because these issues can only be addressed in conjunction. Based on the findings of many researchers on “Jeremiah’s prayer” function and the discussion between Shchurat and Franko in 1904 about Shevchenko and Jeremiah, the author concludes that “Jeremiah’s prayer” is an epigraph and not a rough workpiece as it is presented in the last collection of Shevchenko’s works. Th is fact is important because it may deepen the understanding of Shevchenko’s creative pursuits in 1843—1845, the reasons for his self-identification with Jeremiah, and the interpretation of his collection “Three years” where Moscow captivity is a metaphorical Babylonian one, the ruins of Chyhyryn remind the lost Jerusalem, and Russia is shown as a new Babylon. In this context, the researcher points out the image of Jeremiah at the beginning of the collection “Three years”; the use of “Jeremiah’s prayer” as an epigraph to it; the David’s Psalm 136 (137) about the first Babylonian captivity and the retribution upon Babylon, which may be considered a pretext for Jeremiah’s understanding of the second Babylonian captivity of Judea; the destruction of Jerusalem and its restoration; and finally the motive of atonement taken by Ukrainians for the sins of their fathers in Moscow’s captivity. \nShevchenko developed the last theme following the sample of Jeremiah who saw the cause of all Judea’s misfortunes in its sins against the Lord. Th e motive of Ukrainian atonement for national sins, especially evident in the poems from “Three years” having historical connotations, as in the mystery poem “The Great Cellar”, shows that Shevchenko in 1843—1845 identified himself with Prophet Jeremiah and with King David because these biblical poets and their artistic models helped him create an original literary image of Ukrainian captivity in the Russian Empire and the Ukrainian future aft er overcoming the empire.","PeriodicalId":370928,"journal":{"name":"Слово і Час","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Слово і Час","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33608/0236-1477.2022.03.03-15","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The paper clarifies the literary function of Shevchenko’s “Jeremiah’s prayer”. At the same time, it raises the question of the poet’s identification and self-identification with Prophet Jeremiah because these issues can only be addressed in conjunction. Based on the findings of many researchers on “Jeremiah’s prayer” function and the discussion between Shchurat and Franko in 1904 about Shevchenko and Jeremiah, the author concludes that “Jeremiah’s prayer” is an epigraph and not a rough workpiece as it is presented in the last collection of Shevchenko’s works. Th is fact is important because it may deepen the understanding of Shevchenko’s creative pursuits in 1843—1845, the reasons for his self-identification with Jeremiah, and the interpretation of his collection “Three years” where Moscow captivity is a metaphorical Babylonian one, the ruins of Chyhyryn remind the lost Jerusalem, and Russia is shown as a new Babylon. In this context, the researcher points out the image of Jeremiah at the beginning of the collection “Three years”; the use of “Jeremiah’s prayer” as an epigraph to it; the David’s Psalm 136 (137) about the first Babylonian captivity and the retribution upon Babylon, which may be considered a pretext for Jeremiah’s understanding of the second Babylonian captivity of Judea; the destruction of Jerusalem and its restoration; and finally the motive of atonement taken by Ukrainians for the sins of their fathers in Moscow’s captivity. Shevchenko developed the last theme following the sample of Jeremiah who saw the cause of all Judea’s misfortunes in its sins against the Lord. Th e motive of Ukrainian atonement for national sins, especially evident in the poems from “Three years” having historical connotations, as in the mystery poem “The Great Cellar”, shows that Shevchenko in 1843—1845 identified himself with Prophet Jeremiah and with King David because these biblical poets and their artistic models helped him create an original literary image of Ukrainian captivity in the Russian Empire and the Ukrainian future aft er overcoming the empire.
《耶利米的祈祷》的文学功能:是一个粗糙的工件还是舍甫琴科诗集《三年》的题词?
阐明舍甫琴科的《耶利米的祈祷》的文学功能。同时,它提出了诗人与先知耶利米的身份认同和自我认同的问题,因为这些问题只能结合起来解决。根据许多研究者对“耶利米的祈祷”功能的研究结果,以及Shchurat和Franko在1904年对舍甫琴科和耶利米的讨论,作者得出结论,“耶利米的祈祷”是一个铭文,而不是舍甫琴科最后一部作品集中呈现的粗糙工件。这一事实很重要,因为它可以加深对舍甫琴科在1843-1845年的创作追求的理解,他对耶利米的自我认同的原因,以及对他的作品集“三年”的解释,其中莫斯科的囚禁是隐喻的巴比伦,Chyhyryn的废墟让人想起失落的耶路撒冷,俄罗斯被展示为一个新的巴比伦。在此背景下,研究者指出耶利米在《三年》合集开头的形象;使用“耶利米的祷告”作为它的题词;大卫的诗篇136(137)关于第一次巴比伦囚禁和对巴比伦的惩罚,这可能被认为是耶利米对第二次巴比伦囚禁犹太人的理解的借口;耶路撒冷的毁灭和恢复;最后是乌克兰人为他们的父亲在莫斯科被囚禁期间犯下的罪行而赎罪的动机。舍甫琴科根据耶利米的例子发展了最后一个主题,耶利米认为犹太所有的不幸都是由于他们得罪了上帝。乌克兰人为民族罪恶赎罪的动机,尤其明显地体现在具有历史内涵的《三年》诗歌中,如神秘诗《大地窖》,表明舍甫琴科在1843年至1845年间认同先知耶利米和大卫王,因为这些圣经诗人和他们的艺术模式帮助他创造了乌克兰人被俄罗斯帝国囚禁的原始文学形象,以及乌克兰人战胜帝国后的未来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信